2
$\begingroup$

In a course on classical mechanics, we barely touched upon canonical transformations via generating functions. Just like Lorentz transformations form a group, I want to know if canonical transformations comply with a group structure. But what should be the group operation? In other words, is there a notion of "product" under which it is closed and associative?

  1. Existence of identity element: Identity transformation is canonical because the coordinates are mapped to themselves.
  2. Existence of inverse: Inverse of a canonical transformation is canonical since the Poisson brackets are invariant.
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You seem to have answered your own question? $\endgroup$ – jacob1729 May 21 at 19:49
4
$\begingroup$

There are, confusingly, different definitions of what exactly a "canonical transformation" is. See this answer by Qmechanic for an extended discussion and more useful links. The definition of a transformation in terms of canonical coordinates $q,p$ (a fixed "Darboux chart") does not suffice to talk about these transformations in full generality since the phase space of a generic system is not guaranteed to be covered by a single such chart.

If we either take the viewpoint that a canonical transformation is a symplectomorphism or an infinitesimal symplectomorphism as in this answer by Qmechanic, then the group operation is simply "composition" - carry out the two transformations in succession. Symplectomorphisms are a group under composition: Diffeomorphisms are a group under composition and it's easy to show that the condition for being a symplectomorphism is also fulfilled for the composition of two symplectomorphisms.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ +1. When will the group be abelian? Could you please tell me a resource to look more on this? $\endgroup$ – exp ikx May 22 at 5:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @expikx It is never Abelian (possible proof: The real symplectic group is always a subgroup and it is never Abelian). I'm not really sure what you're looking for in a reference, but one standard reference for symplectic geometry in classical mechanics would be Abraham's and Marsden's Foundations of Mechanics. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind May 22 at 17:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.