3
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the physical property which is measured in diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). I read that these methods estimate the apparent diffusion coefficient (in DWI) or the diffusion tensor (in DTI).

My understanding is that diffusion usually refers to the net movement of a solute (e.g. salt) dissolved in a solvent (e.g. water) from a region of higher concentration to lower concentration.

My understanding is that osmosis usually refers to the net movement of water across a semi-permeable membrane from a region of low solute concentration to region of higher solute concentration.

I read that DWI and DTI measure the "diffusion of water". For example, in the white matter tracts of the brain, "water diffuses at a higher rate along the tract direction than perpendicular to the tract direction". What physical process is this referring to? Is this referring to a net flow of water along the white matter tracts (osmosis?), or the rate at which some solute dissolved in this water could diffuse?

I am struggling to phrase this question clearly, but the main thing I am trying to understand is the physical significance of the quantities measured by DWI and DTI -- the phrase "diffusion of water" does not mean much to me.

| cite | improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Diffusion is basically driven by molecular motion, eg Brownian motion.

Diffusion measures how a certain marked molecule spreads in the surrounding due to molecular motion. Usually, people think of some kind of marker molecule, eg ink in water. If you would like to measure the Brownian motion of water itself, you would also do a diffusion experiment and find yourself with the problem that the diffusion is different for each marker molecule, so you would try to use the least possible amount of the marker to approximate a situation where no marker molecule is present, so its diffusion approximates the Brownian motion of the water.

Imagine now you could color the water molecules themselves. This can be done by NMR: You excite them and apply a position-dependent phase to their magnetic moments. After a while, you reverse the effect. If no Brownian motion is present, you would end up with the same signal as before the position-dependent phase. If motion is present, however, you measure a reduced signal and from this you can deduce the Brownian motion, which basically is the diffusion of water molecules in water.

The water is the medium and the marker molecule at the same time.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I believe that the medium is the brain tissue, or whatever the environment may be. A reference that completely cleared up my confusion was Andrew L. Alexander et al, Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain. Neurotherapeutics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2007. That paper describes the model of anisotropic diffusion of particles, which, in the case of DTI, is applied to water particles in the brain. The model is agnostic of the medium in which the diffusing particles reside - the medium can be anything including brain tissue (part of which is water). $\endgroup$ – srcerer Jul 3 '19 at 18:51
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, however I would not call brain tissue a "medium". But the reasons is semantics. Yet, you can measure the diffusion of water in water, ie: place a glass of water in an MRI machine and start an DWI experiment. That does work, too. $\endgroup$ – M529 Jul 4 '19 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ Why wouldn't you call brain tissue a medium? I'm interested in the semantics. $\endgroup$ – srcerer Jul 5 '19 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ A medium is something of a more homogeneous, simple composition (ie only a certain set of molecules) through which something else (waves, particles) propagates or moves. Brain tissue is much too complex for being a medium - it has plenty of different cell types in it, each of which is extremely complex. In my opinion, it is somehow the same if you would call wood a chemical substance, or maybe even an element. See also lexico.com/en/definition/medium esp. 2.2 $\endgroup$ – M529 Jul 5 '19 at 18:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.