1
$\begingroup$

From my understanding, low solidity wind turbines (such as the three blade type) are more efficient due to a higher tip speed ratio, giving a higher coefficient of performance. However, they are not well suited to high torque applications.

Whereas, high solidity turbines have a lower tip speed ratio hence they are less efficient, but they produce more torque, making them better suited for applications like pumping water.

This is what the text books tell me: low solidity for electricity production vs high solidity for pumping water.

My question; why not just use high speed, low solidity turbines and gear them to produce a low speed, high torque output? This makes use of the more efficient turbine design and allows it to be applied to a high torque requirement. There are other factors in choosing a turbine, such as start up speeds but surely in terms of power output gearing can be used to match a turbine to a load?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by John Rennie, Jon Custer, tpg2114 May 18 at 0:59

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question appears to be about engineering, which is the application of scientific knowledge to construct a solution to solve a specific problem. As such, it is off topic for this site, which deals with the science, whether theoretical or experimental, of how the natural world works. For more information, see this meta post." – John Rennie, Jon Custer, tpg2114
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Many wind turbines (for electricity) are actually geared, but the other way, for higher generator speed. In these turbines, the gearboxes are one of the biggest factors in reliability - which is why many manufacturers, especially offshore, now use costly many-pole permenant magnet generators to avoid the need for a gearbox. $\endgroup$ – Flyto May 23 at 14:16
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe consider migrating this either to sustainability.se or engineering.se? $\endgroup$ – Flyto May 23 at 14:17
2
$\begingroup$

High speed turbines have higher blade stresses, more stringent balancing requirements, and more design issues with the rotordynamics of flexible blades.

By comparison, a low speed turbine that works can be cobbled together with any sort of crude technology - it might not be very efficient, but it can do a useful amount of work and it won't fall apart in a high wind!

People have been making useful low-speed turbines for literally thousands of years - they called them "windmills." From an engineering point of view, you don't fix designs that aren't broken!

It might be worth commenting that large wind turbines (in the MW power range) are usually very low rotation speed and high torque devices (e.g. 5 or 10 RPM) compared with a typical small water pump turbine - but of course the blade tip speeds are high because the tip radius is very big.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Wind turbines are application-designed, and adding gears (to address different applications) costs money. In addition, a many-bladed turbine is efficient enough as-is to run a water pump given that the required work comes for free. You just scale up the blade disc diameter a bit if you want more work output and live with the inefficiency.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.