2
$\begingroup$

I searched for this question on the internet but didn't got a satisfactory explanation.

What I thought on the topic is that the cause of resistance is 'the effective nuclear charge'. The nucleus holds the electrons with it's effective nuclear charge. Now if in a wire ,we bring potential difference across it's two points, then a electric force will be applied on the electrons of the wire. This force will try to take the electron away from the nucleus while the nucleus will try to keep it with itself. Thus the electron will not have as much acceleration as it should have had. Also as the electron detaches itself from one atom, it goes into the orbital of the consequent atom and the energy released from this(electron gain enthalpy) will cause any other electron to eject from the atom and move to the consequent atom and this goes on resulting in flow of electrons. Also the heating effect is caused because when the electron enters the orbital of an atom, maybe it's effective nuclear charge is strong enough to atleast keep some of the electrons and the electron gain enthalpy released from this will cause the heating. Also metals are good conductor because their effective nuclear charge on the electron in the outermost shell is not as strong as that exerted by a non metal and so allow flow of electrons easily.

This was what I thought on the topic. Please tell me if it is correct or not and if it is not correct, then what is the real cause of resistance and what is the flaw in my thinking.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Look up metallic bonding. The valence electrons aren’t bound by the nuclei. They form a “sea” of electrons shared by the positive ions and are highly mobile. That’s what makes metal wires such good conductors (have very low resistance) $\endgroup$ – Bob D May 11 at 9:46
  • $\begingroup$ Related question $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens May 11 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ this may help with the figure hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/ohmmic.html $\endgroup$ – anna v May 12 at 13:59
4
$\begingroup$

Electrical conduction occurs in a variety of substances, and the microscopic picture is very different in the different cases. For example, electricity can be conducted by ions in a liquid (as in our nervous systems), or by conduction electrons in a metal.

In general, we have some set of free charge carriers that are not bound to a specific place in the substance. These charge carriers are moving around at thermal velocities, which are typically very high, e.g., hundreds of meters per second for ions, or even higher for electrons. This motion is ordinarily random, so it doesn't create a current.

When we impose an electric field, the charge carriers start to move in the direction of the force. But due to collisions, they don't accelerate indefinitely. For ions in a liquid, these would be collisions with atoms and molecules. For conduction electrons in a metal, these would typically be collisions with phonons and defects. These collisions dissipate energy into heat, and they also limit the velocities that can build up. We end up with some drift velocity, which is typically centimeters per second, i.e., it's a small trend against the background of the fast thermal and quantum-mechanical motion.

Differences in resistance between materials depend on the density of free charges and also on the factors that influence the frequency of collisions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If that is the case, then why is structure of an atom like that. In an atom, the electron are bound to the nucleus so then how is it that the electrons are in a random motion? Also please tell why the explanation i provided isn't correct, what is the flaw in it. Thank you $\endgroup$ – Hritik Ladia May 14 at 12:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.