4
$\begingroup$

Thinking about the fact that raindrops come with a typical size I was wondering how this can be determined. I am pretty sure that the friction with air and the quantity of water in the clouds are involved with the upper limit of the raindrop size but I cannot figure out the details: maybe the friction is the sole responsible, or maybe is the contrary and the clouds are not thick enough to produce raindrops larger than a bit.

Also, what determines the minimum size? Maybe this side of the problem does not involve meteorology and could be explained by surface tension and other static characteristics. Edit: as noted in a comment, this could also be influenced by the dust particle seeding the formation of the raindrop.

For the maximum size I was thinking of computing a length involving air viscosity $\gamma$, air and water density $\rho_{1/2}$ and gravitational acceleration $g$. By dimensional analysis we have:

$$[\gamma]=\frac{[M]}{[T]}\qquad[\rho]=\frac{[M]}{[L]^3}\qquad[g]=\frac{[L]}{[T]^2}$$ And therefore if we want to build a length we will use a product: $$[\gamma^{\alpha}\rho^{\beta}g^{\lambda}]=[M]^{\alpha+\beta}[L]^{-3\beta+\lambda}[T]^{-\alpha-2\lambda}\equiv[L]$$ Which implies $\alpha=-\beta=-2\lambda$ and $\lambda=1+3\beta\;$, so that $\;\lambda=-\frac{1}{5}\;,\;\beta=-\alpha=-\frac{2}{5}$. So the size should be something like: $$d\sim\left(\frac{\gamma^2}{g\rho_{..}^2}\right)^{1/5}\cdot f\left(\frac{\rho_1}{\rho_2}\right)$$ Where $f$ is an unknown function and I cannot understand which density (or product of densities) will go in the dimensional factor.

Clearly dimensional analysis cannot do all the work here, moreover I would regard the resulting size as a typical size rather than an upper bound.

So the question remains: how do we determine the upper (and the lower) bound on the size of a raindrop?

Thanks for any help!

Edit: in the dimensional computation we should at least consider also the surface tension, $\tau$. This has dimension of a force: $[\tau]=\frac{[M][L]}{[T]^2}$. This will add even more freedom in the guess-result for $d_{max}$, thus making some physical reasoning even more needed.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Aren't raindrops formed by moisture forming on a particle? $\endgroup$ – user207455 Apr 28 at 8:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SolarMike yeah you are right. I don't think the upper bound should be influenced by the size of the seed particle, but maybe the lower could be.. $\endgroup$ – AoZora Apr 28 at 8:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Given that I have seen really fine rain and big fat drops, do you think wind speed is possibly a factor to include? $\endgroup$ – user207455 Apr 28 at 8:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @SolarMike Yeah in the presence of wind we should have an additional effect resembling an increase in either speed of raindrops or friction. I think that the simplest thing to understand is the wind-less case though. $\endgroup$ – AoZora Apr 28 at 9:02
  • $\begingroup$ See Prupacher and Klett, Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation $\endgroup$ – Chet Miller Apr 28 at 11:26
1
$\begingroup$

I'm sure there's an upper limit on how large a raindrop can be. Surface tension and molecular attraction isn't going to keep a bigger drop together as it falls through the air at high speed, it will end up splitting into multiple drops.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.