Is there a nice way to write Navier-Stokes equations in exterior calculus

I'm considering to study some high-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. One problem is to do write the viscous equation for vorticity, helicity and other conserved quantities. I think it might be better if it is possible to work with differential form and exterior calculus? Is there any reference that I may find somewhere?

• You mean in a form other than $\rho (\partial_t + v \cdot \nabla) v= f+ \dot{\overline \sigma}(\dot \nabla)$? Or formulas for the quantities you mention? – Muphrid Dec 25 '12 at 22:09

MS Mohamed et al begin with a "standard vector calculus formulation of the NS equations",

$$\frac{∂ \bf u}{∂ t} - \mu ∆ {\bf u} + ({\bf u} \cdot \nabla) {\bf u} + \nabla p = 0$$ $$\nabla \cdot {\bf u} = 0$$

and use the rotational form,

$$\frac{∂ \bf{u}}{∂ t} + \mu \nabla \times \nabla \times {\bf u} - {\bf u}\times(\nabla \times {\bf u}) + \nabla p^d = 0$$

to eventually derive

$$\frac{∂ {\bf u}^\flat}{∂ t} + (-1)^{N+1} \mu \star d \star d {\bf u}^\flat + (-1)^{N+2}\star ({\bf u}^\flat \wedge \star d{\bf u}^\flat) + d p^d = 0,$$ $$\star d \star {\bf u}^\flat = 0$$

But they also later derive it as

$$\frac{∂ d {\bf u}^\flat}{∂ t} + (-1)^{N+1} \mu d \star d \star d {\bf u}^\flat + (-1)^{N}d\star({\bf u}^\flat \wedge \star d{\bf u}^\flat) = 0,$$

Judging from the stars, -1s, and flats, these results could probably be simplified by substitution of the codifferential operator $d^\dagger$. Both are also the rotational form; I would rather provide a convective form, but I'm unaware of such a derivation in the literature.

I urge Troy to actually post an answer rather than referring us to his book, but lacking the points I cannot leave a comment to that effect.

protected by AccidentalFourierTransformApr 21 '18 at 20:15

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?