I'm a senior physics/chemistry student working on a practical assignment where I am trying to identify the resistance of CuSO4 in solution (distilled water). I have recorded my data and determined it is an inversely proportional relationship (res=1/conc.).

My working hypothesis was that the relationship would be directly proportional, though I wasn't really sure at the time. I was hoping someone would be able to explain the reasoning behind this in more detail, or even reference some sources that go into detail that I could use in my report.

  • $\begingroup$ You may invert your relation, Conductivity = 1/res =conc $\endgroup$ – patta Apr 17 at 9:14
  • $\begingroup$ How did you come up with your hypothesis? Distilled water in itself is not conducting. The more you increase your concentration, the higher the amount of species that can contribute to conduction. Hence, resistance decreases with increasing concentration. $\endgroup$ – lmr Apr 17 at 9:23
  • $\begingroup$ The Wikipedia article Conductivity (electrolytic)) might be of use? Increasing the density of mobile change carriers will increase the conductivity (decrease the resistivity). $\endgroup$ – Farcher Apr 17 at 10:36

Why is simple: When you dissolve more of any salt that ionizes in water, there are more ions to "shuttle" energy carrying electrons across at a time. How is a bit more complicated. You see when you dissolve a salt in water, the molecules, due to some phenomenon, dissociates and each atom is charged either positively or negatively due to less or more electrons respectively. When you insert two electrodes in the solution to complete a circuit, the anode terminal is positively charged due to holes concentration, and cathode terminal negatively charged due to electrons concentration. The anode attracts the negatively charged anions and on contact with the anode, they loose electron(s) to the electrode. Likewise the cathode attracts positively charged cathions, and they gain electron(s) on contact with the electrode. The atoms become their neutral self as they drift away from the electrodes. These atoms, due to the inherent cahotic random motion at the atomic scale, collide, bond, and ionize almost simultaneously and instantaneously to restart the cycle again. Now the more of these ions available to transport electrons and also create a dense cluster of themselves increasing the chance of quicker collision to restart the cycle, the more conductive or less resistant a salt solution is. The above explained process explains why a warmer solution is to some degree more conductive than a cooler one, because the increased kinetic energy in the solution helps increase the frequency of collision of neutral atoms.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this answer! Can you at all further explain why the relationship for concentration/resistance isn't linear though? Or, perhaps, why it should be but isn't? I've found that its inversely proportional which doesn't seem to make sense intuitively. $\endgroup$ – Rupert Apr 18 at 0:15
  • $\begingroup$ Well, I'm not very sure of the degree of progression of a salt solution's resistance against concentration to be linear or otherwise. But what I know is you've got to separate conductivity from resistivity. Resistance means the push against the progress or propagation of something. More concentration means more dissolved salt per volume of water, and more salt means more ions available to shuttle. The more the ions in the solution, the less resistant the solution is (inverse proportion) and the more conductive it is (direct proportion). $\endgroup$ – TechDroid Apr 18 at 5:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.