1
$\begingroup$

example: A car crashes into a wall, breaking the wall into pieces at collision.

Was it the transfer of of KE from the car to the wall particles that did this? Or the force exerted onto the wall by the car? Or the transfer of momentum from the car to the wall’s particles?

What actually causes the wall to break in the collision?enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Everything is forces. Energy is just an easy way to describe what those forces can do. $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Apr 14 at 23:43
  • $\begingroup$ very insightful as always Aaron $\endgroup$ – Ubaid Hassan Apr 15 at 0:02
0
$\begingroup$

The other answer deals with the classical view, so as an extension, I will give you a more QM explanation.

The materials you talk about are mostly solids, like the wall, car's metal etc. These solids have certain lattice structures, where the molecules and atoms are in certain relative positions, and these relative positions can hardly change.

The bond that bonds the atoms into the molecular structure of the lattice in the metal and the wall is called covalent bond (some residual effect of the EM force). This bond means that certain electrons, will exist around the whole molecule rather then the single atoms.

And yes, it is this effect of the EM force that keeps the atoms in the molecule, and the lattice. Now if you want to brake the lattice (brake the wall), then you need to apply enough energy to brake the covalent bond.

When the car hits the wall, the kinetic energy of the car's matal's molecules and atoms is enough to brake the wall's atoms out of the covalent bond of the wall. The metal of the car has a lattice that is even more tough, strong. The metal atoms will stay in the lattice more likely, and together they make sure that the kinetic energy is transferred onto the wall's molecules and atoms, and since this level of kinetic energy reaches the limit, where the wall's lattice's atoms will lose the covalent bond, the wall will fall apart.

So there are two effects:

  1. the kinetic energy needs to be enough to brake the atoms out of the covalent bond from the wall's lattic

  2. the lattice's covalent bond of the car's metal is just tougher, stronger then the wall's lattice's covalent bond

You can see this if you try to brake the wall with let's say another material, a wooden car or a plastic car or a glass car or a ceramic car. That will never brake the wall (completely), however hard you hit the wall with it.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How is this a QM explanation rather than just a molecular explanation? I know the molecules can be described using QM, but I don't see where the QM is in your answer $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Apr 14 at 23:48
  • $\begingroup$ When the KE is transferred to the covalently bonded atom by the car, this means the atoms vibrations are energetic enough to break the covalent bond it’s in right? But doesn’t that also mean that the point of impact between the car and wall is going to be very hot too? because temperature is just average KE if the particles in a substance. $\endgroup$ – Ubaid Hassan Apr 14 at 23:53
  • $\begingroup$ There is no need for a QM explanation of what is clearly explainable by classical mechanics. $\endgroup$ – Bob D Apr 15 at 0:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @UbaidHassan you are correct. The vibrational energies of the molecules of the wall's lattice and the car's lattice are going to go really high at one point in time (the impact). This vibrational energy of the molecules is what we usually use to describe as heat. Yes part of the kinetic energy of the car's lattice's molecule's will transform into heat but please note that when the covalent bond brakes, energy is released too, and that can cause heat (raise in the vibrational energies of the molecules along the broken parts) too. $\endgroup$ – Árpád Szendrei Apr 15 at 0:12
1
$\begingroup$

When a car collides with the wall or a concrete retaining wall two things happen.

-The car starts to crumple and in better built cars, absorbs a lot of energy of the collision in sacrifice parts designed to collapse while absorbing a lot of the energy.

-A fast moving stress wave starts to expand rapidly in the wall and will find almost immediately the existing weak points such as grout joints, existing cracks, sudden changes in geometry, fatigue hair lines, and will blow them apart by mostly vibrating them in totally incongruent frequencies.

Many of the random appearing break patterns are but the weakest face and or the outcome of the an original hair crack hit by another ricochet shockwave echoing back from a part of the wall that has been vibrating with just the right frequency and intensity. This process continues till enough mass has been obliterated that has taken almost all the energy of the collision.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The kinetic energy of the car is absorbed by the wall materials breaking molecular bonds and generating heat.

From the work energy theorem, the net work done on the car by the wall (average force time distance) equals the change in kinetic energy of the car. Since the force exerted by the wall on the car is in the opposite direction of the movement of the car, the work done by the wall on the car is negative, meaning energy is transferred from the car to the wall. That energy is dissipated as heat in (and some sound from) the wall.

Hope this helps.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.