In terms of bare parameter $\lambda$, the $\phi\phi\to\phi\phi$ scattering amplitude is $\lambda\phi^4$ theory is given by $$\mathcal{M}=-i\lambda+iC\lambda^2\Big[\ln\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{s}\Big)+\ln\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{t}\Big)+\ln\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{u}\Big)\Big]+\mathcal{O}(\lambda^3)\tag{1}$$ where $C$ is a computable numerical constant independent of $\lambda$ and $\Lambda$. In expression $(1)$, the parameter $\lambda$ is bare parameter and the cut-off $\Lambda$ is unknown.

According to Anthony Zee's book of QFT (See Eq.4, page 149 of Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell) the whole point of renormalization is to measure the physical coupling $\lambda_P$ at a reference value of $s_0,u_0,t_0$ and express the bare parameter $\lambda$ in terms of the physical coupling $\lambda_P$ measured experimentally. To this end, he writes $$-i\lambda_P=-i\lambda+iC\lambda^2\Big[\ln\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{s_0}\Big)+\ln\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{t_0}\Big)+\ln\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{u_0}\Big)\Big]+\mathcal{O}(\lambda^3)\tag{2}.$$

Why does he write $-i\lambda_P$ in the LHS? More concretely, how did he know the LHS is linear in the physical coupling $\lambda_P$?

  • $\begingroup$ It is supposed to be a perturbation series and $\lambda_P(\lambda)$. This is just a formal matter as you are managing infinities here as $\Lambda$ should go to infinity. Anyway, if properly done, it works very well. It is called renormalization. $\endgroup$ – Jon Apr 9 at 13:56

Eq. (2) is the definition of the renormalized coupling $\lambda_P$. The definition of $\lambda_P$ is that it is the value such that the resummed 4-vertex has scattering amplitude $-\mathrm{i}\lambda_P$. That's what we mean by "physical coupling": the value the coupling would have to have so that a single tree-level vertex would yield the same amplitude as the fully resummed vertex of the actual theory.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.