5
$\begingroup$

Most stuff I read online says that to explain the Anomalous Zeeman Effect they had to assume the electron's gyromagnetic ratio is $\frac{-e}{m}$ instead of the classical $\frac{-e}{2m}$.

But, since what causes the Anomalous Zeeman Effect is not the electron's angular momentum directly, but its magnetic moment, it seems to me like it would've been more reasonable to asssume the electron has the classical gyromagnetic ratio and a spin angular momentum of $\hbar$.

This means they must've had a reason to assume the electron's angular momentum is $\frac{\hbar}{2}$.

Keep in mind this was before Bohr and Heisenberg developed proper Quantum Mechanics.

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

what causes the Anomalous Zeeman Effect is not the electron's angular momentum directly, but its magnetic moment

On the contrary, both are involved. The value of spin angular momentum enters in determining total angular momentum of a given stationary state, then its degeneracy $2J+1$. Total magnetic moment causes removal of degeneracy in presence of a magnetic field and the amount of splitting is proportional to its magnitude. So electron's magnetic moment contributes to that amount.

If both angular momentum and magnetic moment of electron spin were doubled then all level splittings would be of equal size and the splittings of transition frequencies would be proportional to $\Delta M$, which can only be $0,+1,-1$. So all lines in presence of a magnetic field would split in three: normal Zeeman effect.

On the contrary, with only the spin magnetic moment of double size different unperturbed levels get split by different amounts and the splittings of transition frequencies exhibit different patterns according the pairs of unperturbed levels involved. Also the number of frequencies varies: anomalous Zeeman effect.

I can't expect this quick summary may fully answer your question. I'm afraid the only way to understand the matter is to study it on a QM textbook.

A final historical note. I wouldn't say that Bohr contributed to creating QM. His rôle was rather in establishing its epistemological foundations according the so-called Copenhagen interpretation. I stop here as this topic better pertains to history of physics.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I actually meant to write Schrödinger, not Bohr, I guess I got distracted. Do you know of any textbook in particular where I could find a full, semiclassical treatment of this? Or you could leave a long answer if you want :D. $\endgroup$ – user140323 Apr 7 at 3:47
0
$\begingroup$

Here the theoretical explanation of the Anomalous Zeeman effect.

Approach
The approach is theoretical and based on the angular momentum commutation relations $[J_i, J_j] = i \hbar \epsilon_{i j k} J_k$, which follow from the properties of rotations and where $J_i$ is defined as the generator of infinitesimal rotation.

Machinery
You define a new operator $J^2 = J_x J_x + J_y J_y + J_z J_z$ which commutes with every one of $J_k$, that is $[J^2, J_k] = 0$. Then you look for the simultaneous eigenkets of $J^2$ and $J_z$:
$J^2 \vert a, b \rangle = a \vert a, b \rangle$
$J_z \vert a, b \rangle = b \vert a, b \rangle$
To determine the allowed values of $a$ and $b$, it is convenient to define the ladder operators $J_\pm = J_x \pm i J_y$. The physical meaning of such operators is that if you apply them to an eigenket of $J_z$ the resulting ket is still an eigenket of $J_z$, but its eigenvalue is now increased (decreased) by one unit of $\hbar$. Instead, the ladder operators do not change the eigenvalue of $J^2$.

Strategy
With this conceptual machinery you can construct the angular momentum eigenkets and their eigenvalue spectrum. The outcome is that the maximum value of the $J_z$ eigenvalue is $j \hbar$, where $j$ is either an integer or a half-integer, with spectrum $(-j, -j + 1, ..., j - 1, j) \hbar$. That is, for a given $j$, there are $(2 j + 1)$ states, each step consisting of one unit of $\hbar$.

Consistency with experiment
As per the experimental evidence (Stern–Gerlach) the electron spin angular momentum presents two states. In order to match the theory with the measurement, it is required $j = \frac{1}{2}$. So, the electron spin sets to $\frac{\hbar}{2}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ When Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit came to that conclusion the full theory of Quantum Mechanics, inclusing ladder operators hadn't been developed yet. $\endgroup$ – user140323 Apr 7 at 3:48
  • $\begingroup$ @user140323. I relabelled my post as the theoretical justification of the Anomalous Zeeman effect. $\endgroup$ – Michele Grosso Apr 7 at 8:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.