In Griffiths, it is noted that there is a discontinuity in the electric field for a material with a surface charge density.
What is the significance of this boundary condition in practicality when calcuating the electric fields of say, a conductor, where all the charge is located at the surface (because there can be no electric field in the "meat" of the conductor)?
For instance, say I want to find the electric field everywhere for a metal conducting sphere of radius $a$.
I can deduce that the only existent charge density is that of a surface charge density $\sigma$ as the object is conducting.
By application of Gauss' Law, I can show that for $r<a$, $\mathbf E = 0$ as there is no enclosed charge until $r=a$.
For $r \ge a$, I can envelop the sphere in a Gaussian surface with radius $r$ such that $r \ge a$.
$$\implies \oint \mathbf E \cdot \hat n \ dS = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0} = \frac{\sigma A}{\epsilon_0}$$
$$\implies |\mathbf E| \ 4 \pi r^2 = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} 4 \pi a^2$$
$$\implies \mathbf E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \frac{a^2}{r^2} \hat r$$
Perhaps I've just found the answer to my question by considering $\mathbf E (r=a)$? However, $$\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \hat n$$ seems to be a change in $\mathbf E$ as it is $\mathbf E_{above} - \mathbf E_{below}$, so why is it a value at $r =a$ here, and not, for instance, the change in $\mathbf E$ for $\mathbf E (a - dr) \to \mathbf E (a + dr)$?