1
$\begingroup$

So when we usually linearize general relativity with respect to metric perturbations $g_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow g_{\mu\nu}+h_{\mu\nu}$, we compute the correction to the inverse of the metric to first order in $h$:$$g^{\mu\nu}\rightarrow g^{\mu\nu}-g^{\mu\rho}g^{\nu\tau}h_{\rho\tau}:=g^{\mu\nu}+h^{\mu\nu}$$ where we define $h^{\mu\nu}$ to be $h_{\mu\nu}$ with indexes lifted using the inverse of the background metric.

To get this result we ask that to the first order $$(g_{\mu\tau}+h_{\mu\tau})(g^{\tau\nu}+h^{\tau\nu})=\delta_{\mu}^{\nu}$$ Imposing that this holds exactly we get: $$(g_{\mu\tau}+h_{\mu\tau})h^{\tau\nu}=-h_{\mu\tau}g^{\tau\nu}$$ Inverting the first factor we have $$h^{\rho\nu}+h^{\rho\mu}h_{\mu\tau}g^{\tau\nu}=h^{\rho\mu}(\delta^{\nu}_{\mu}+h_{\mu\tau}g^{\tau\nu})=-g^{\rho\mu}g^{\nu\tau}h_{\mu\tau}$$ but I don't know how to solve this. I should invert $(\delta^{\nu}_{\mu}+h_{\mu\tau}g^{\tau\nu})$; is there a symbolic way to get to the result without using the explicit formula of the inversion of a matrix? (or equivalently: is perhaps the resulting expression simple?) Even better: is there any other (more or less physical) reasoning to get to the exact correction to the inverse metric?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, it is actually not clear to me whether you are looking for the exact inversion formula or the perturbative inversion formula. $\endgroup$
    – Void
    Commented Apr 3, 2019 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ First of all, your 2nd equation is not correct. How do you know that that LHS will give RHS? See my answer to a similar question here - physics.stackexchange.com/a/330277/133418 $\endgroup$
    – Avantgarde
    Commented Apr 3, 2019 at 17:52

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

If we write the metric as $g=\eta+h$, where $\eta$ is a background metric, it seems OP is asking for a formula for a $k$ such that $$g^{-1}~=~\eta^{-1}+k.$$ Perturbatively (i.e. for small enough $h$), we can use a geometric series to write $$k~=~g^{-1}-\eta^{-1}~=~\eta^{-1}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-h\eta^{-1})^n~=~-\eta^{-1}h\eta^{-1}+{\cal O}(h^2).$$ since it is $$\eta^{-1}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-h\eta^{-1})^n=\eta^{-1}(1+h\eta^{-1})^{-1}=(\eta+h)^{-1}=g^{-1}$$

$\endgroup$
0
0
$\begingroup$

Notice that you are asking for the general form of the inverse matrix of some $A+B$ only under the assumption that we know the inverse $A^{-1}$ and that $A+B$ is non-degenerate. In dimension 4 there is no simple exact formula for the inverse in such a general case.

However, it often happens that linearized perturbations have a special form. For instance, perturbations sourced by quasi-static (Newtonian) gravitational sources in most commonly used coordinates (Cartesian, spherical) induce only perturbations on the diagonal. Then, of course, you invert by taking every term $a+b$ on the diagonal and replacing it by $1/(a+b)$.

For stationary sources such as the exterior of rotating objects the total linearized metric has a $2\times2$ block in a $t-\varphi$ sector and is diagonal in the rest in typical axial systems of coordinates. These also have very simple exact inversion formulas.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ yeah you are right, thanks! $\endgroup$
    – AoZora
    Commented Apr 3, 2019 at 18:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.