-2
$\begingroup$

If any operator is commute with Hamilton then they are labelled such a way that the energy eigenstate are equal and we also know it is a constant of motion. I don't related constant of motion with above theory. please help me

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by JMac, John Rennie, GiorgioP, Aaron Stevens, Jon Custer Apr 3 at 19:35

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be any self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space and $H$ the Hamiltonian of a quantum system: one can show (Ehrenfest theorem) that $$ \frac{d}{dt}\langle A \rangle = \frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle [A, H] \rangle + \langle \frac{\partial A}{\partial t} \rangle $$ where $\langle A \rangle$ denotes the expectation value onto a generic state $|\psi\rangle$. Therefore unless the operator explicitly depends on time, it is a constant of motion as long as it commutes with the Hamiltonian.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain the explicitly dependence by an example. $\endgroup$ – SUMANTA SAHOO Apr 2 at 9:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What in particular don't you understand? $\endgroup$ – gented Apr 2 at 9:25
  • $\begingroup$ The explicitly dependence of operator on time $\endgroup$ – SUMANTA SAHOO Apr 2 at 11:28
  • $\begingroup$ Well, take any function explicitly depending on time (this has nothing to do with quantum mechanics: if the problems are what a partial derivate is then it is another question). $\endgroup$ – gented Apr 2 at 11:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.