2
$\begingroup$

This is a follow-up question to a previous question regarding a minimum-energy invariant of the electromagnetic field. @ChiralAnomaly showed that there is indeed an invariant minimum energy density whenever $E\cdot B \not= 0$; and that there is a one-parameter family of inertial frames in which $E$ and $B$ are parallel. In those frames the energy density is the minimum energy density, and is the same in all of them.

The minimum energy density is easy enough to calculate. Is there a straightforward way to derive a formula that, given $E$ and $B$ in one frame, yields all the Lorentz boosts that result in $E$ parallel to $B$?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

We need a Lorentz transformation which will make $\vec{E}$ and $\vec{B}$ from inertial frame $S$ parallel in an inertial frame $S'$, i.e. $\vec{E'} \times \vec{B'} = 0$. Consider $c=1$ for calculations.

Let us try $\vec{v'} = \alpha (\vec{E} \times \vec{B})$ for some $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}/\{0\}$. Here, $v'$ denotes the velocity of the frame $S'$ with respect to $S$.

Then, $$\vec{E'} = \gamma(\vec{E}+\vec{v'}\times\vec{B}) = (1 - \alpha B^2) \vec{E}+\alpha (\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}) \vec{B} \\ \vec{B'} = \gamma(\vec{B}-\vec{v'}\times\vec{E}) = (1 - \alpha E^2) \vec{B}+\alpha (\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}) \vec{E}$$

Case 1 (a): Of course, as you mentioned, if $\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B} = 0$ and $|\vec{E}|=|\vec{B}|=0$, $\vec{E'}$ and $\vec{B'}$ cannot be made parallel.

Case 1 (b): Even if $\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B} = 0$, but $E^2 \ne B^2$, we can make either $\vec{E'}$ or $\vec{B'}$ zero, by choosing $\alpha = \displaystyle\frac{1}{\text{max}(E^2, B^2)}$

Case 2: Suppose, $\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B} \ne 0$, then $\vec{E'}$ and $\vec{B'}$ can be made parallel by choosing an $\alpha$ such that $$\alpha^2 [(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B})^2 - E^2B^2] = 1 - \alpha(E^2+B^2).$$ The relative velocity $\vec{v'}$ of the frame $S'$ with respect to the inertial frame $S$ is given by $$\frac{\vec{v'}}{1+ v'^2} = \frac{\alpha(\vec{E}\times\vec{B})}{1+\alpha^2({\vec{E}\times \vec{B}})^2} = \frac{\alpha (\vec{E}\times \vec{B})}{1+\alpha^2[E^2B^2-(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B})^2]}= \frac{\vec{E}\times\vec{B}}{E^2+B^2}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In your equations for E' and B', should the v be primed? $\endgroup$ – S. McGrew Apr 24 at 13:36
  • $\begingroup$ and by max(a,b) do you mean the greater of a and b? $\endgroup$ – S. McGrew Apr 24 at 13:40
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, thank you. Updated to $v'$. And by $\text{max}(a,b)$, I mean whichever is greater. $\endgroup$ – exp ikx Apr 24 at 13:41
  • $\begingroup$ The formulas you've given provide one inertial frame in which E and B are parallel. But there is a continuum of such inertial frames, corresponding to further boosts in the direction of E (or B) in the frame you've identified. What I'm hoping for is a formula that provides all such frames (neglecting spatial rotations of coordinates), as a function of a single parameter. $\endgroup$ – S. McGrew Apr 24 at 13:48
  • $\begingroup$ I see. I don't know how to formulate that parameter. This question got more interesting for me. I'll update my answer once I work it out in the coming summer vacation. $\endgroup$ – exp ikx Apr 24 at 19:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.