From elementary calculus, we have that the chain rule occurs when we differentiate a function like $f(y(x)) \equiv f(x)$:

$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{dx}}[f] = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{dx}}[f(y(x))] = \frac{df}{dy}\frac{dy}{dx} \tag{1}$$

But, consider now a well-known [1] expression about velocity transformation in elemetary Special Relativity context:

$$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{dt'}}[x'] = \frac{dx'}{dt}\frac{dt}{dt'} \tag{2}$$

So, I'm struggling to understand this expression because suppose the situation: I'm a observer in reference frame $S'$, so I would construct quantities like velocity "with my proper primed coordinates", ($x'$, $t'$). Hence, the spatial coordinates will be parametrized by "my proper primed coordinate $t'$"

$$U' =: \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{dt'}}[x'(t')] \tag{3}$$

Of course that if I want to know the velocity in a reference $S$, we have to transform $(1)$ accordingly Lorentz Transformations (LT). My problem isn't acctualy to derive the velocity transformations between $S'$ and $S$ (vice-versa), but to deal properly with the chain rule. Note that if $(1)$ is the chain rule, and $(2)$ is a valid expression, then the function $x'$ must have the form (I guess) of:

$$x' \equiv x'[t(t')] \tag{4}$$

And my question arise here in $(4)$: What suppose to mean, physically, $t(t')$? . Because it's occur naturally that if we perform a LT like $S \to S'$ time will have the dependency like $t'(t)$ because , $t'(t) \equiv t' = \gamma(t-xv/c^2)$.


I'm not sure exactly what your question is, but perhaps we can start with the following, and work from there....

From the Lorentz transform we know x' = F(x, t). Specifically:

$ x' = \gamma \left(x - vt \right)$.

We also know

$t' = \gamma \left(t - \frac{v x}{c^2}\right)$


$v' = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial t'} = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial t}\frac{\partial t}{\partial t'} + \frac{\partial x'}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial t'}$

So we arrive at

$v' = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial t'} = F(x', t') = G(x, t)$

Specifically, $x'$ is a function of both $t$ and $x$, which are independent variables. In the same way $t'$ is also a function of $x$ and $t$, again, two independent variables. Does this help at all?

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your help. But I need a explicit form of dependency, something like: $x'[x'(x,t), t'(x,t)]$ $\endgroup$ – M.N.Raia Mar 29 '19 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ Well I guess you could write v' = v'(x',t') = v'(x'(x,t), t'(x,t)). Is that the sort of thing you're looking for? $\endgroup$ – Anon1759 Mar 30 '19 at 19:21

For your equation 2, the chain rule should be:

$\frac{dx'}{dt'} = \frac{\partial x'}{\partial t}\frac{\partial t}{\partial t'} + \frac{\partial x'}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial t'}$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, but this expression means nothing to me. How could have unprimed coordinates been given in terms of primed coordinates, if the primed coordinates are those we want to know? $\endgroup$ – M.N.Raia Mar 29 '19 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ I apologize if this was confusing. The point was that $x'$ depends on both $t$ and $x$, not just $t$. I rewrote my answer focussing on your equation [2] rather than equation [4]. $\endgroup$ – Laurence Lurio Mar 29 '19 at 19:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.