3
$\begingroup$

From experience I am aware that a taught string will generally vibrate with a constant frequency. I wanted to prove this by considering the relation of distance from the resting position, and its subsequent velocity (or velocities if non-constant) away from that initial extension.

I realize a suitable end goal would be to prove that a taught string will take the same amount of time to reach its opposite maximum for an ideal range of initial extensions, but I do not have the relevant background to lay out the actual math. What math is involved and how is it composed?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Have you seen a demonstration that for small displacement a taught string obeys the wave equation? $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Mar 19 at 2:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Consider a finite length of string. For each infinitesimal mass element, you write down its equation of motion (i.e $F=ma$). You would obtain a partial differential equation (PDE) known as wave equation. Solve the PDE with your boundary conditions and initial conditions. Then you get what you want. $\endgroup$ – K_inverse Mar 19 at 2:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is easy enough to show that standing waves form with a discrete spectrum. It's a bit harder to show that the rest of the spectrum is strongly damped. $\endgroup$ – dmckee Mar 19 at 2:41
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "from first principles"? There might be several derivations to reach this conclusion. $\endgroup$ – nicoguaro May 23 at 16:06
  • $\begingroup$ Why should first principles be unique? $\endgroup$ – user7778287 May 24 at 21:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.