3
$\begingroup$

In the diagram (A) , the individual waves are crossing at an angle to each other , so the dispacemnt of the particle at their intersection must have an angle between them , and that must involve vector addition and not algebraic addition , The direction of displacemnt of the particle will be different from the direction of displacements of individual waves.Why are the displacements being added algebraically then , I am having a Resnick Halliday Walker , I have included the pictures of the pages concerned from two different chapters , the equation from chapter 16 was used in 17. While in 16 the equation was derived for two travelling in one direction ,i.e not inclined mutually , while it was used in chapter 17 for two waves travelling inclined to each other to my surprise. enter image description here

enter image description here enter image description here

I think I know the problem , could it be that the diagram A that I drew is wrong ,and the two wave are not flat on the screen but in a perpendicular plane to the screen , that way algebraic addition works , if that's the case , then how to find the equation for resultant wave in the configuration I have setup in diagram A

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

You are correct: the fields are added vectorially in every case. However, we almost always work in the far field approximation. In this limit the two lines $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ you drew are almost parallel, so the displacement fields (or electric fields, etc., demanding on the situation) are in almost the same direction, so they effectively add algebraically.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ oh , those were approximations ! $\endgroup$ – Nutan Prakash Mar 16 at 18:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.