I am confused about, what I believe, refers to passive and active transformations in QM. What I have understood so far is that the matrix elements $\langle \psi| \hat{H}|\phi\rangle$ should remain unchanged under transformations; this implies that $\hat{H} = \hat{U}^\dagger \hat{H} \hat{U}$.

On the other hand, under certain transformation $\hat{U}$, an arbitrary operator $\hat{\Omega}$ transforms as $\hat{U} \hat{\Omega} \hat{U}^\dagger$.

1) Why should the matrix elements of the hamiltonian remain unchanged under a transformation? Is that the same as saying: "The evolution of the state is governed by the hamiltonian; under a transformation the system should still evolve in the same way, hence the matrix elements should be conserverd"?

2) What does $\hat{H} = \hat{U}^\dagger \hat{H} \hat{U}$ mean? Is that talking about how the hamiltonian transforms? Or is it only a condition on the transformation $\hat{U}$?

3) What is $\hat{\Omega} \to \hat{U} \hat{\Omega} \hat{U}^\dagger$ opposed $\hat{U}|\phi\rangle$. Does an active transformation mean applying $\hat{U}$ to every state, while a passive transformation is leaving vectors as they are and transforming the opeartors as $\hat{\Omega} \to \hat{U} \hat{\Omega} \hat{U}^\dagger$? Or does applying a transformation mean doing both of the above?


$ \langle \psi | \hat{H} | \phi \rangle$ should remain unchanged under transformations.

This is certainly not true in general for an arbitrary transformation. I think perhaps what you meant is that $ \langle \psi | \hat{H} | \phi \rangle$ should remain unchanged under a basis transformation.

This implies that $H = U H U^\dagger$.

This is not true. What you are asserting here is that $[H, U]=0$, which has no reason to be true without additional assumptions.

I think your confusion lies in what actually constitutes a unitary basis transformation. If we go to a different basis, the transformation prescription is

\begin{align*} &|\psi\rangle \mapsto U|\psi \rangle\\ &\langle \psi | \mapsto\langle \psi | U^\dagger\\ & \hat{H} \mapsto U\hat{H}U^\dagger. \end{align*}

Plug these transformations into $\langle \psi | \hat{H} | \phi \rangle$ and you can clearly see that that it is invariant under a basis transformation.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ > This implies $\hat{H} = U^\dagger H U$. Note the difference conjugate to the left, instead of the right. Does that change anything? From what I was told $\hat{H} = U^\dagger H U$ refers to the invariance of the Hamiltonian, not to how it transforms $\endgroup$ – Daniel Duque Mar 16 '19 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ Would the left hand side $H$ refer to the non-transformed Hamiltonian, and the right hand side $H$ refer to the transformed Hamiltonian? In that case $H = U^\dagger U H U^\dagger U$? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Duque Mar 16 '19 at 13:26
  • $\begingroup$ The left dagger is just a matter of which one you want to call the inverse, it makes no difference since they’re each daggers of one another $\endgroup$ – InertialObserver Mar 16 '19 at 17:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.