0
$\begingroup$

I have the following problem.

Given a finite system, let us say a box of side $L$ containing $N$ "ideal gas" non-interacting particles, properties such as the entropy can be defined, in this case, $S = - \log ((L^3)^N/N!)$ (I am neglecting the momentum contribution, just configurational entropy).

In the thermodynamic limit, as $L \to \infty$ and $N \to \infty$ such that the density $ \rho = \frac{L^3}{N}$ is constant, all works perfectly.

But how to handle a system where $N$ is constant, and $L \to \infty$ ?

Take the simplest case, $N = 1$. The entropy of one particle in an infinite box diverges due to the volume term in the logarithm, while the density $\to 0$.

This seems absurd to me: a syste with "infinite entropy" and nihil density. Furthermore, if anybody mentioned a zero density case, can this refer to an arbitrary, yet finite number of particles in an "infinite" volume?

I must be missing some point.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How did you come up with that formula for entropy? It doesn't look right. Entropy is an extensive quantity $\endgroup$ – dedekindCuttage Feb 24 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ Ok I will address your point by editing the question $\endgroup$ – Smerdjakov Feb 24 at 16:10
1
$\begingroup$

$N=1$ is not a thermodynamic system, but, indeed, if $N$ is large but fixed and we take the volume to infinity then the entropy per particle $S/N$ will diverge. This is simply configurational entropy, so there is no question this result is reliable. Note that

1) The entropy per particle diverges very slowly. In order to increase $S/N$ by 10$k_B$ we have to increase the volume by $e^{10}$.

2) A very dilute gas equilibrates very slowly. To reach the correct equilibrium entropy from a generic initial state will take a verly long time (the equilibration time diverges at least as a power of the volume).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your reply...Could you please clarify what you meant by, "this is simply configurational entropy, so there is no question this result is reliable"? $\endgroup$ – Smerdjakov Feb 24 at 17:29
  • $\begingroup$ $S=k_B\log(\Omega)$ as engraved in Boltzmann's tomb stone, and clearly $\Omega\sim V^N$ $\endgroup$ – Thomas Feb 24 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ Ok I just wanted to check your statement meant, "the expression is so straightforward that there are no diubts about its correctness", and not " usingvobly the configurational entropy makes the physical representation so poor that rhis result is only formal at best", if you see what i mean... $\endgroup$ – Smerdjakov Feb 24 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's what I had in mind. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Feb 25 at 3:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.