I have worked with the Navier Stokes equations before but I'm a physicist. I was talking to a mathematician and they use a complete different notation and I am very lost.

First of all, I use the Control Volume method for discretization and they use Finite Element.

Second, they talk about variational forms and H and Q spaces \Omega domains, which I have seen for the first time.

Can anybody point my way to a document, or book, or small chapter where I can understand the mathematical variational point of view of the Navier Stokes equation as simple as possible? (I'm interested in the incompressible stationary case for a fluid, so, very simple.)


Before answering, please see our policy on resource recommendation questions. Please write substantial answers that detail the style, content, and prerequisites of the book, paper or other resource. Explain the nature of the resource so that readers can decide which one is best suited for them rather than relying on the opinions of others. Answers containing only a reference to a book or paper will be removed!

  • $\begingroup$ Related physics.stackexchange.com/q/71257/25301; not entirely sure about the details of the recommended text(s) containing such chapters, however. It may be useful for you to check out at least the table of contents to see how useful it'd be. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Feb 18 at 16:26

I found two books which look interesting but still feel it is not "for dummies" enough.

  • The Finite Element Method: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, Texts in Computational Science and Engineering, by M. G. Larson and F. Bengzon

  • A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics by Chorin and Marsden

But still if someone has a better suggestion for a variational Navier Stokes derivation that is not so mathematical for a physicist to understand, please let me know.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.