1
$\begingroup$

For an exercise question, I'm wondering on how I can determine the dimensionality of a state space spanned by Majorana fermions.

A (Dirac) fermionic excitation ($f , f^\dagger$) has a state space of dimension 2, spanned by the vacuum state $|0\rangle$ and the one-particle-state $f^\dagger |0\rangle$.

For Majorana fermions $\gamma = \gamma^\dagger$, I can't see how to define a meaningful creation / annihilation operator. The answers on this forum seem to suggest that for a single Majorana operator, the notions of creation/destruction/particle number are not meaningful, however given a set of Majorana operators, the corresponding operators can be constructed by essentially mapping to a (Dirac) fermion. From the answer to this question, I would guess that I get a two-dimensional fermionic state space for every pair of Majorana fermion operators I have. So, three of them ($\gamma_x, \gamma_y, \gamma_z$) give me three sets of creation/annihilation operators $c_{xy}, c_{yz}, c_{zx}$ and thus an 8-dimensional state space (for context, see the next paragraph).

For concreteness: I am given a fermion representation of a spin-1/2 lattice model and have to answer the questions whether there is a redundancy when describing the model either via a set of two fermionic creation/annihilation operator pairs or via three Majorana fermion operators. My solution would be to determine whether the state spaces of the spin model (two-dimensional at a single lattice site) and the fermionic representation match in order to see whether there can be a one-to-one correspondence of states. For the Schwinger representation (usual fermionic creation/annihilation), I count 4 fermionic base states ( $|00\rangle , |01\rangle, |10\rangle, |11\rangle$),but for the Majorana representation I'm not sure how to proceed or whether this line of thought is even valid.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.