3
$\begingroup$

How does one measure the chemical potential of a substance/ thermodynamic system? I am asking this question for two reasons:

(1) The measure on phase space: Textbooks typically state that one should take the integral measure on phase space to be $\frac{dpdq}{2\pi\hbar}$. Typically, one "justifies" the presence of the $\hbar$ by arguing that the phase space measure should be dimensionless or that quantum mechanics tells us that phase space is quantized in units of $\hbar$. It seems to me that the presence of the $\hbar$ is unnecessary and has no physical affect other than shifting the chemical potential: \begin{align} d^{3N}pd^{3N}q\rightarrow \frac{d^{3N}pd^{3N}q}{(\hbar)^{3N}}&\implies S\rightarrow S-3Nk_B\ln(\hbar)\\ &\implies\mu\rightarrow\mu+3k_B\ln(\hbar)\tag{1} \end{align} The last implication following from the fact the chemical is $\mu=\frac{\partial S}{\partial N}\vert_{E,V}$. i.e. adding the $\hbar$ term to the measure only affects the $N$ dependence of the entropy and therefore only affects quantities that are related to the entropy by a derivative with respect to $N$, which is only the chemical potential. By Eq.($1$) one can see that the only affect of the $\hbar$ is a constant shift of the chemical potential, hence I am wondering: does a constant shift in the chemical potential have any physical significance? Is the choice of the constant in the phase space measure arbitrary and unnecessary?

(2) Gibbs "paradox": In the famous Gibbs paradox for the mixing of two ideal gases, one figures out that if you want the entropy of an ideal gas to be an extensive quantity then one should add a $\frac{1}{N!}$ to the phase space measure. Again, by the exact same reasoning as above, this will only affect the entropy and the chemical potential: \begin{align} d^{3N}pd^{3N}q\rightarrow \frac{d^{3N}pd^{3N}q}{N!}&\implies S\rightarrow S-k_B\ln(N!)\\ &\implies \mu\rightarrow \mu+k_Bln(N) \end{align} Here we do not have a constant shift of the chemical potential as before, hence I am wondering: how would one experimentally measure whether the $\frac{1}{N!}$ should be there or not by measuring the chemical potential? As a corollary, is the extensivity of the entropy of a gas an empirical question? I know that the justification for the $\frac{1}{N!}$ comes from the quantum indistinguishably of identical particles, but I would also like to understand how you could also use a measurement of the chemical potential to justify its presence in another way.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.