0
$\begingroup$

I'm interested in the time reversal properties of a term in the non-relativistic QM Hamiltonian proportional (up to a true scalar) to $$ H \propto (\vec S_1 \times \vec S_2) \cdot \vec L $$ The situation with $\vec L$ is clear, it does change the sign. What about the first term in the product? Doesn't its parity depend on the particular spin state?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

$\mathbf{L}$, $\mathbf{J}$ and $\mathbf{S}$ all change sign under time reversal.

For $\mathbf{L}$ this is trivial, since it depends on $\mathbf{p} = \frac{\mathrm{d}\mathbf{x}}{\mathrm{d}t}$ and with $t \rightarrow -t$ you get $\mathbf{p} \rightarrow -\mathbf{p} $.

For spin, I guess at the end of they day it just worked. But the procedure is rooted in treating spin as a magnetisation $\propto \mathbf{M}$.
And $\mathbf{M}$, like $\mathbf{B}$, are generated by currents so by terms like $\frac{\mathrm{d}q}{\mathrm{d}t}$, so again $t \rightarrow -t$.

See here for more discussion.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! So, looks like it changes the sign under both $P$ and $T$, and is, therefore, $PT$-symmetric. $\endgroup$ – mavzolej Feb 7 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ Well technically it should obey CPT symmetry. I guess it does because coulomb interactions don’t care about spin? So it’s always gonna be C symmetric? $\endgroup$ – SuperCiocia Feb 7 at 17:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.