0
$\begingroup$

The optical theorem links the imaginary part of the forward scattering amplitude to the total decay width of a particle: $\mathrm{Im}\,M_{i\to i} = m\Gamma_{tot}$. Here $\Gamma_{tot} = \frac{1}{2m} \sum_x |M_{i\to x}|^2$. My QFT lecturer told us that the Breit-Wigner propagator $\frac{i}{p^2-m^2+im\Gamma_{tot}}$ follows from that. How?

I tried to use the LSZ formula to replace the forward amplitude to the propagator. However I don't even know if the LSZ formula is applicable here (due to the complex mass). If one can use it I find something like (for a scalar particle) $iM_{i\to i} \sim (p^2 - m^2)^2 \cdot \frac{i}{p^2-m^2+i\varepsilon}$ which should simply vanish for on-shell particles, whether or not $m$ has an imaginary part.

So how does the Breit-Wigner propagator follows from the optical theorem? In particular why is the $\Gamma$ in the Breit-Wigner propagator the same as in the optical theorem?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ WP useful? $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Feb 5 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, but how does anything on this Wikipedia page answer this question? :D $\endgroup$ – toaster Feb 6 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ It sends you to L Brown's friendly derivation to the generic propagator of an unstable particle, and whence the relativistic Breit-Wigner formula. I did not stick to the somewhat off-mainstream twists and turns of your proposed path to it. $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Feb 6 at 21:46
  • $\begingroup$ This just explains that a complex pole of propagator is related to a exponential decay of the propagator. This does not show that the $\Gamma$ in the propagator is actually the total decay width as calculated in scattering theory: $\Gamma_{tot} = \frac{1}{2m} \sum_x |M_{i \to x}|^2$. $\endgroup$ – toaster Feb 7 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ I took you to Lowell Brown's (6.314-6.3.23), but I can't make you drink... Perhaps if you took that primary section into consideration in restructuring your question you might have better luck. $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Feb 7 at 16:34

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.