Consider a point $P$ which does the following (one dimensional) movement:

  1. Uniform acceleration $a_0$ (proper aceleration) from $t=0$ to $t=T$ (time measured in lab's frame).

  2. Uniform deceleration $a_0$ from $t=T$ to $t=3T$.

  3. Uniform acceleration $a_0$ from $t=3T$ to $t=4T$.

I want to know how much time has passed in $P$'s frame. That is, what is $ \Delta\tau$?

Since the movement starts with no velocity, we can easily calculate its four-velocity: $$u^\mu=c(\cosh(a_0\tau/c),\sinh(a_0\tau/c),0,0).$$

As $u^0=\gamma c$, we conclude that $\gamma=\cosh(a_0\tau/c)$ and thus the duration of the first part can be calculated as $$T=\int_0^{\Delta\tau_i} \cosh\left(\frac{a_0}{c}\tau\right)\mathrm{d}\tau\quad\implies\quad \Delta\tau_i=\frac{c}{a_0}\mathrm{arcsinh }\left(\frac{a_0}{c}T\right).$$

However, for the other parts the initial velocity is not zero and then the function I get when calculating $\Delta t=\int\gamma\:\mathrm{d}\tau$ is not easily invertible.

Is there a better way to do this?

  • $\begingroup$ Can you see that there are four congruent legs of your trip? Split the trip from T to 3T. $\endgroup$
    – robphy
    Feb 1, 2019 at 21:22
  • $\begingroup$ The proper time differences between $t=0$-$t=T$, $t=T$-$t=2T$, $t=2T$-$t=3T$ and $t=3T$-$t=4T$ are all the same? That is not clear to me. $\endgroup$
    – Gabriel
    Feb 1, 2019 at 21:24
  • $\begingroup$ Can you sketch it on a spacetime diagram? $\endgroup$
    – robphy
    Feb 1, 2019 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ @robphy To be honest, I never found spacetime diagrams to be that useful. Probably I don't understand them well yet. $\endgroup$
    – Gabriel
    Feb 1, 2019 at 21:27

2 Answers 2


From your setup, there is symmetry to exploit. If you break up the T-to-3T trip in half, you can see [by drawing a spacetime diagram] that you have four congruent legs to your trip. You just calculated the duration of the first leg. So, by symmetry, multiply that by 4 to get the total duration.


In this second update, I have shown three uniformly accelerated observers as with dashed worldlines, which are hyperbolas on a spacetime diagram. Since the magnitudes of their proper-accelerations are equal, these hyperbolas are congruent--related by reflections in space, reflections in time, and translations on this spacetime diagram.
[If we were doing Galilean relativity, these would be congruent parabolas.]

This round-trip starting and ending at rest in this frame is essentially the splicing of four congruent portions.

[As a simpler case, suppose the traveler departed with a nonzero outgoing speed and returned at the same speed.... essentially the magenta observer. Is it clear that if that trip were split into halves, those halves have equal elapsed times.]


Note that the 0-to-T leg is the mirror image in space of the 2T-to-3T leg.
Note that the T-to-2T leg is the mirror image in space of the 3T-to-4T leg.

The 0-to-T leg is the "time-reverse" of the 3T-to-4T leg.
The T-to-2T leg is the "time-reverse" of the 2T-to-3T leg.


Consider the first leg of the trip... uniform-acceleration $a_0$ to the right.

Suppose instead the traveler went in the opposite direction in space.
After the same time $\Delta t_1$, is it clear that the traveler would have the opposite velocity (same speed, opposite direction) as the original?
This space-reflected segment is a translation of the leg that starts [back] at the turnaround event.

Similarly, if you ran time in reverse [retrodiction, if you will], then at earlier time $-\Delta t_1$, is it clear that the traveler would have had the opposite velocity (same speed, opposite direction) as the original?
This time-reflected segment is a translation of the leg that returns at the reunion event.

  • $\begingroup$ I would apreciate any further explanation about what the durations are the same. $\endgroup$
    – Gabriel
    Feb 1, 2019 at 21:31
  • $\begingroup$ I added a spacetime diagram to my answer. $\endgroup$
    – robphy
    Feb 1, 2019 at 22:01
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for you answer but I still don't think it is clear that the durations are the same. I feel like I have just drawed the diagram in such a way. $\endgroup$
    – Gabriel
    Feb 2, 2019 at 9:14
  • $\begingroup$ I updated the spacetime diagram to show three uniformly-accelerated observers (with the same magnitude of proper-acceleration) that your traveler essentially hitched rides with to complete the round-trip. $\endgroup$
    – robphy
    Feb 2, 2019 at 13:03

You correctly wrote the expression for the four-velocity and $\gamma$ but it'd be much easier to use straight forward the time coordinate (Rindler) transform for a uniformly accelerated frame (without integral calculus and 4-velocities) as $$t=\frac{c}{a_0}\mathrm{asinh }\left(\frac{a_0}{c}\tau\right)$$ where $\tau$ is proper time in (in P's frame) and $t$ is time in "lab frame" or at rest frame. So, using this general transform for the first part $$t_1=\frac{c}{a_0}\mathrm{asinh }\left(\frac{a_0}{c}T\right)$$ which is the same as you obtained. The next part can be derived by the use of the same time transform but with the negative $a_0$ and for the duration is $2T=3T-T$, so $$t_2=\frac{c}{-a_0}\mathrm{asinh }\left(\frac{-a_0}{c}2T\right)=\frac{c}{a_0}\mathrm{asinh }\left(\frac{a_0}{c}2T\right)$$ Then obviously $t_2 \neq 2t_1$. The third part is given by delta $T=4T-3T$, so $$t_3=\frac{c}{a_0}\mathrm{asinh }\left(\frac{a_0}{c}T\right)$$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.