1
$\begingroup$

Electrostatics textbooks delight at computing the electric field or the potential created by a known distribution of charge, ignoring the fact that this is rather a non practical question. In practicality, you have a voltage generator and conductors. You know the output voltage of the generator with respect to the earth, and hence the electrical potential of the connected conductor. It turns out that I don't see, in my old books of physics, how to handle electrostatic questions related to the floating potential of conductors, even though they should be solvable somehow. To put flesh on bones, I propose the following general question:

Assume x,y,z is an axes system, and that the y-z plane is occupied by a conductive plate at a known potential V with respect to the earth. Now, a conductive material M of neutral global electrical charge is placed at some distance of the plate, and is not connected to anything else. Furthermore, the distance of M to the plate is much smaller than the distance of M to anything connected to the earth (so that, the direct influence of the earth on M can be neglected). What is the potential of M with respect to the earth ?

For the sake of simplicity, it can be assumed that M is a copper cylindrical rod of length 1 along the x axis, located from x = 1 to x = 2. Regarding the unspecified parameters, any assumption can be done. Also, if the "infinite plate" is problematic, it can be assumed it's a large disk or a large rectangular plate.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is it just solving the Laplace's equation with appropriate boundary conditions? $\endgroup$ – K_inverse Jan 30 at 10:55
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see, sorry. Since I know neither the potential of the floating conductor, nor its charge distribution, how can I specify the boundary conditions ? $\endgroup$ – MikeTeX Jan 30 at 13:31
1
$\begingroup$

In empty space, you should have $\nabla^2V=0$. For conductors of known potential, you have a boundary condition $V=V_i$ where $V_i$ is the voltage on the $i$th conductor. For conductors of unknown voltage, you know that:

1) $\nabla V$ is perpendicular to the conductor's surface.

2) $\oint_{\text{conductor surface}} (\nabla V) \cdot d\vec{A} = 0$

(Since the conductor has no net charge.)

Together with the boundary conditions at infinity, this should be enough constraints to solve the problem. Of course, that leaves the question of how one should mathematically handle this.

In terms of mathematical advice, I don't have much. It seems like it would be a good idea to pretend that the floating conductors actually each have their own fixed potential. Then solve the equation for the set of potentials that satisfies (2) for all the floating conductors.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This makes sense. It would be interesting to know if someone has ever worked out a simple example along these lines though. $\endgroup$ – MikeTeX Jan 31 at 7:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.