The Navier-Stokes equations consist of the momentum equation and the continuity equation. Consider the incompressible versions for the purpose of this question.

Continuity is always talked about as a restriction or a constraint, while the momentum equation is always talked about as a modified version of Newton's second law.

The latter is pretty acceptable to me as being physically motivated. The former is a little disappointing, as it is argued for by insisting on a constant density.

My question is why isn’t this explained by some force keeping the fluid together? Why can’t this be part of the momentum equation as some sort of internal force that keeps things together? Why must it be its own equation?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Fluid mass conservation law. $\endgroup$ – Alex Trounev Jan 27 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ The continuity equation $\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho \vec v) = 0$ does not demand incompressibility of the fluid. In fact, this is a more general property as a result of the symmetry of a system via Noether's theorem. $\endgroup$ – GodotMisogi Jan 28 at 5:31

You have already accepted that the fluid is incompressible, and that means its volume cannot change. Since the mass of the liquid cannot change either, that means the density must be a constant.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.