I am new to this type of problem and feel as if I am going in circle with regards to boundary conditions.

I am interested in finding an analytic solution for: $\mu\nabla^{2}\underline{u}+(\lambda+\mu)\nabla\nabla\cdot\underline{u}=0$,

which I think in this case boils down to solving for $\underline{u}$ such that:

$(\lambda + \mu)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\frac{\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial u_{y}}{\partial y})+\mu(\frac{\partial^{2}u_{x}}{\partial x^{2}}+ \frac{\partial^{2} u_{x}}{\partial y^{2}})=0$


$(\lambda + \mu)\frac{\partial}{\partial y}(\frac{\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}+ \frac{\partial u_{y}}{\partial y})+\mu(\frac{\partial^{2}u_{y}}{\partial x^{2}}+ \frac{\partial^{2} u_{y}}{\partial y^{2}})=0.$

Problem Setup

Is the following process to solve for $\underline{u}$ sensible/valid:

  1. Set the traction ($t_{i}^{b}$) to zero along all four sides. [Admittedly not sure if this is sensible given displacement conditions]
  2. Solve for the stresses along the boundary via $\sigma_{ij}n_{j}=t_{i}^{b}=0$, ignoring corners as normal to a point is not well-defined.
  3. Use $\sigma$ along the boundaries as boundary conditions for the biharmonic equation ($\nabla^{4}\phi=0$) to determine a suitable Airy Stress function, $\phi(x,y)$
  4. Use $\phi(x,y)$ to solve for the internal stresses, strains and displacement field $\underline{u}$
  5. Verify that $\underline{u}$ honors boundary conditions by evaluating function along the boundaries

Or am I going about this whole problem incorrectly? In which case any help would be appreciated.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.