0
$\begingroup$

Ryder at the beginning of the chapter about renormalization defines the "superficial degree of divergence" of diagrams in $\lambda \phi^4$ theory. I'll recap the derivation.

A diagram in $\lambda\phi^4$ theory has $E$ external lines, $I$ internal lines of which $L$ are loops and $n$ vertices. Each internal line contributes with a factor $\frac{1}{p^2}$ and each undetermined loop momentum with an integral $\int d^d p$ in $d$ dimensions, so we define the superficial degree of divergence as $$D=dL-2I$$

and we say that if $D\geq0$, the diagram must diverge.

But consider the simplest diagram in $\lambda\phi^4$ with 4 external lines and no loops, just crossing in the center like an $X$. This diagram has no internal lines and no loops, so $D=0$ and the diagram should diverge logarithmically. Nevertheless, the value of the diagram is just $$ -i\lambda(2\pi)^4\delta^{(4)}(p_1+p_2-p_3-p_4)$$

which is finite. What happened?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

As we start study divergence of diagrams only when we introduce loops, I think this formula for the superficial degree of divergence is meant to be applied only to those cases where at least a loop is present;

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.