I'm following John Terning book on Supersymmetry and in particular I'm trying to check the susy variations of the Wess-Zumino model given by

$\mathcal{L}_s = \partial^\mu \phi^* \partial_\mu \psi \,, \quad \mathcal{L}_f=i \psi^\dagger \overline{\sigma}^\mu \partial_\mu \psi$

In order to compute the variation of the fermionic part it's necessary to consider:

$[\sigma^\mu \overline{\sigma}^\nu + \sigma^\nu \overline{\sigma}^\mu]_\alpha^\beta = 2\eta^{\mu \nu} \delta_\alpha^\beta \,, \quad [\overline{\sigma}^\mu {\sigma}^\nu + \overline{\sigma}^\nu {\sigma}^\mu]_{\dot{\alpha}}^{\dot{\beta}} = 2\eta^{\mu \nu} \delta_{\dot{\alpha}}^{\dot{\beta}} \, , \quad \delta \psi = -i(\sigma^\nu \epsilon^\dagger)_\alpha \partial_\nu \phi \,$

Following the book one only needs to use the mentioned properties of the $\sigma$'s, by doing so

$\delta \mathcal{L}_f = -\epsilon \sigma^\nu \partial_\nu \phi^* \overline{\sigma}^\mu \partial_\mu \psi + \psi^\dagger \overline{\sigma}^\mu \sigma^\nu \epsilon^\dagger \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi \\ \delta \mathcal{L}_f= -2\epsilon \partial^\mu \phi^* \partial_\mu \psi + 2 \psi^\dagger \epsilon^\dagger \partial^\mu \partial_\mu \phi + \epsilon \sigma^\mu \overline{\sigma}^\nu \partial_\nu \phi^* \partial_\mu \psi-\psi^\dagger \overline{\sigma}^\nu \sigma^\mu \epsilon^\dagger \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi$

While the right answer is given by

$\delta \mathcal{L}_f = - \epsilon \partial^\mu \psi \partial_\mu \phi^* - \epsilon^\dagger \partial^\mu \psi^\dagger \partial_\mu \phi + \partial_\mu (\epsilon \sigma^\mu \overline{\sigma}^\nu \psi \partial_\nu \phi^* - \epsilon \psi \partial^\mu \phi^* + \epsilon^\dagger \psi^\dagger \partial^\mu \phi)$

that exactly cancels the bosonic part of the action. Performing some integration by parts in my computation gives

$\delta \mathcal{L}_f = -2\epsilon \partial^\mu \phi^* \partial_\mu \psi - 2 \partial^\mu \psi^\dagger \epsilon^\dagger \partial_\mu \phi + \partial^\mu (2\psi^\dagger \epsilon^\dagger \partial_\mu \phi) + \epsilon \sigma^\mu \overline{\sigma}^\nu \partial_\nu \phi^* \partial_\mu \psi-\psi^\dagger \overline{\sigma}^\nu \sigma^\mu \epsilon^\dagger \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi $

While the first 3 terms resemble the right answer there are problems with the factor of 2 and if I integrate by parts the remaining 2 terms I get 2 total derivatives plus 2 terms that don't seem to cancel between each other. What's the thing that I'm missing in order to obtain the right result?


Starting with $\mathcal{L}_f = i \psi^{\dagger} \bar{\sigma}^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \psi $ we can compute the variation of this kinetic term by using $\delta \psi = -i \sigma^{\nu} \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial_{\nu} \phi$ (which implies $\delta \psi^{\dagger} = i \epsilon \sigma^{\nu} \partial_{\nu} \phi^*$, since the $\sigma^{\mu}/ \bar \sigma^{\mu}$ are Hermitian)

$$ \delta \mathcal{L}_f = - \epsilon \sigma^{\nu} \bar \sigma^{\mu}\partial_{\nu} \phi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi + \psi^{\dagger} \bar \sigma^{\mu} \sigma^{\nu} \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} \phi . $$

The goal is to simply obtain the terms needed to cancel variations of the complex scalar kinetic energy term. In the first term, insert the identity $[\sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} + \sigma^{\nu} \bar \sigma^{\mu}]^{\beta}_{\alpha} = 2 \eta^{\mu \nu} \delta^{\beta}_{\alpha} $ and notice that symmetry of partial derivatives in the second term allows us to write $(\bar \sigma^{\mu} \sigma^{\nu})_{ \dot \alpha}^{ \dot \beta} \partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} \phi = \frac{1}{2} ( \bar \sigma^{\mu} \sigma^{\nu} + \bar \sigma^{\nu} \sigma^{\mu} )_{ \dot \alpha}^{ \dot \beta} \partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} \phi = \delta^{\dot \beta}_{\dot \alpha} \partial^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \phi $ so we obtain

$$ \delta \mathcal{L}_f = - 2 \epsilon\partial^{\mu} \phi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi + \epsilon \sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} \partial_{\nu} \phi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi + \psi^{\dagger} \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \phi . $$

Half of the first term will cancel one piece of the $\phi$ KE term. We can obtain the second term we need by inserting the chain rule $\partial_{\mu}( \psi^{\dagger}_{\dot \alpha} \partial^{\mu} \phi) = \partial_{\mu} \psi^{\dagger}_{\dot \alpha} \partial^{\mu} \phi + \psi^{\dagger}_{\dot \alpha} \partial^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \phi $ into the last term to obtain

$$ \delta \mathcal{L}_f = - 2 \epsilon \partial^{\mu} \phi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi + \epsilon \sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} \partial_{\nu} \phi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi + \partial_{\mu} ( \psi^{\dagger} \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial^{\mu} \phi ) - \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial_{\mu} \psi^{\dagger} \partial^{\mu} \phi $$

where we note that $\psi^{\dagger} \epsilon^{\dagger} = \epsilon^{\dagger} \psi^{\dagger}$. Now we simply need to write the two unnecessary terms (half of the first and the second) as a total derivative. Inserting the chain rule into half of the first term gives $- \partial_{\mu} ( \epsilon \psi \partial^{\mu} \phi^* ) + \epsilon \psi \partial_{\mu} \partial^{\mu} \phi^* $ and also doing the same in the second term yields $\partial_{\mu} ( \epsilon \sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} \psi \partial_{\nu} \phi^*) - \epsilon \sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} \psi \partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} \phi^* = \partial_{\mu} ( \epsilon \sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} \psi \partial_{\nu} \phi^*) - \epsilon \psi \partial^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \phi^*$ where we've again used symmetry of the partial derivatives. The result is then

\begin{align} \delta \mathcal{L}_f & = - \epsilon \partial^{\mu} \phi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi - \partial_{\mu} ( \epsilon \psi \partial^{\mu} \phi^* ) + \epsilon \psi \partial_{\mu} \partial^{\mu} \phi^* + \partial_{\mu} ( \epsilon \sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} \psi \partial_{\nu} \phi^*) - \epsilon \psi \partial^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \phi^* + \partial_{\mu} ( \psi^{\dagger} \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial^{\mu} \phi ) - \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial_{\mu} \psi^{\dagger} \partial^{\mu} \phi \nonumber \\ & = - \epsilon \partial^{\mu} \phi^* \partial_{\mu} \psi - \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial_{\mu} \psi^{\dagger} \partial^{\mu} \phi + \partial_{\mu} ( \epsilon \sigma^{\mu} \bar \sigma^{\nu} \psi \partial_{\nu} \phi^* - \epsilon \psi \partial^{\mu} \phi^* + \psi^{\dagger} \epsilon^{\dagger} \partial^{\mu} \phi ) .\nonumber \end{align}


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.