2
$\begingroup$

If a particle has a complex mass, $p^2-m^2=0$ leads to $p^μ \notin \mathbb R^4$. What does it mean?

When you want to calculate S-matrix elements of decay process $\langle p_f,\ldots\mid p_i\rangle$, you compute the $n$-point correlation function $$\langle 0\mid Tφ(x_1)φ(x_2)\ldots\mid 0\rangle$$ and using the LSZ formula. Fourier transformation of the correlation function has the poles at $p_j^2=m_j^2$ ,because it includes the vacuum polarization amplitudes$$ = \frac i {p_j^2-m_j^2+O((p_j^2-m_j^2)^2)}\approx \frac i{p_i^2-m_i^2}$$ on each external legs in diagrams. The LSZ formula says when you multiply $Π_j(p_j^2-m_j^2)/i$ and take the limit $p_j^2→m_j^2$, you get S-matrix elements $\langle p_f,\ldots\mid p_i\rangle$. Therefore, you may know that you need to consider only "amputated diagrams" when you calculate S-matrix.

However, beyond the tree level, the vacuum polarization amplitude of unstable particle has the pole at not real but complex value. This means on shell limit $p_i^2→m_i^2$ leads to $p_i^\mu \notin \mathbb R^4$. On the other hand, if you take limit such as $p_i^2\to\operatorname{Re} m_i^2$, you cannot do the approximation "vacuum polarization amplitudes $ \approx \frac i{p_i^2-m_i^2}$", because $p_i^2$ is far from the pole.

After all, my question is how to compute decay rates of unstable particles correctly. Can I calculate S-matrix elements by computing "amputated diagrams" as usually done?

The related problem is noted in Srednicki's textbook on P.162 http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html
He said in and out state should consist of infinitely long-lived particles. He thought unstable particles present as intermediate states, and regarded decay late as a quantity related to the width of resonance. (p.165 (25.25))

$$f(E)=\frac{1}{E-E_0+iΓ/2}.$$

Fourier transformation of $f(E)$ gives $g(t)=\exp(iE_0t-Γt/2)$, which seems something expressing decay. I want to know too the precise meaning of this procedure. (At first, I considered the time evolution of $|ψ\rangle = \int dE \, f(E)|E\rangle$ by Schrodinger equation, but $|ψ(t)\rangle\neq g(t)|ψ(0)\rangle$).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I'll discuss this in the context of Yukawa theory, and use renormalized perturbation theory. The way I understand it is this.

Setup: Consider the renormalization scheme

$$ \psi_R = \frac{1}{\sqrt{Z}}\psi_0 \\ m_R = \frac{1}{Z_m} m_0 $$

where $Z_i = 1 + \delta_i$. Then the renormalized propagator is.

$$G^R = \frac{1}{Z_2} G^{bare}. $$

Now recall that summing over all 1PI insertions we may write

$$iG^{bare} = \frac{i}{\not{p} - m_0 + \Sigma(\not{p})}$$

where $\Sigma$ is the sum over all 1PI insertions. Now, we can write $\Sigma = \Sigma_2 + {\cal O}(g^4)$ keeping only those insertions of order less than $g^4$. So that our renormalized propagator to order $g^2$ is

$$G^R = \frac{1}{1+\delta}\frac{i}{\not{p} - m_0 + \Sigma_2(\not{p})} \\ \boxed{G^R= \frac{i}{\not{p} - m_R + \Sigma_R(\not{p})} } $$

where we have defined

$$ \Sigma_R = \Sigma_2 + \delta \not{p} - (\delta + \delta_m)m_R $$

Now, recall that we define the physical mass as the pole of the propagator. Therefore,

$$ m_P - m_R + \Sigma_R(m_P) = 0 .$$

This implies that

$$ \boxed{\delta_m m_P = \Sigma_R(m_P)} $$


Your question: Let us call $\Sigma_2(\not{p}) = i\Delta m$, anticipating that the correction is purely imaginary. Then, our propagator is

$$\tilde{G}^R= \frac{i}{\not{p} - m_R+ i\Delta m} $$

where now we know that our propagator has a pole at $m_P$.

Recall that the amplitude for a particle to propagate from $x$ to $y$ is given by the fourier transform

$$D(x-y) = \int \frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{i}{\not{p} - m_R + i\Delta m}e^{-ip(x-y)} $$

To make things easier suppose that y=0. Then we have

$$D(x) = \int \frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{i}{\not{p} - m_R+ i\Delta m}e^{i\mathbf{p\cdot x}}e^{-iEt} $$

Where $E = \sqrt{p^2 + m_{rest}^2}$. What is the mass of the particle in its rest frame? Well by definition it's the pole of the propagator! And so we may replace

$$E = \sqrt{p^2 + (m_R - i \Delta m)^2} \\ =\sqrt[4]{\left(-{\Delta m}^2+m^2+p^2\right)^2+4 {\Delta m}^2 m^2} \left(i \sin \left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right)+\cos \left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right)\right)\\ \boxed{E \equiv \xi \left(i \sin \left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right)+\cos \left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right)\right) }$$

where $\phi$ is the $\mathrm{Arg}$ of the radicand.Finally, we obtain that

$$ \boxed{D(x) = \int \frac{d^4p}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{ie^{i\mathbf{p\cdot x}} e^{-i\xi\cos(\frac{\phi}{2}) t}}{\not{p} - m_R+ i\Delta m}e^{-\xi\sin(\frac{\phi}{2}) t}} $$

and so we see that indeed the probability for a particle to exist at a time $t$ decays exponentially.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for answering my questions! I clearly understand how to interpret decay rates. D(y-x)=<0|Tφ(y)φ(x)|0>=<$y_i|exp(-iH(y_0-x_0)|x_i$>, therefore the probability amplitude of the state will exponentially decrease as time goes on according to your calculation. I did not suppose Fourier transformation of f(E) appeared in the calculating D(y-x) from $\tilde G^R(p)$. I greatly appreciate your answer! $\endgroup$ – Takumi Hayashi Jan 9 at 7:29
  • $\begingroup$ Right! That’s how I think about it at least $\endgroup$ – InertialObserver Jan 9 at 7:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.