I enjoy amateur astronomical calculations. I calculate earth true anomaly and noticed a bug in my software just as earth passing through j2000 point and instead of going to 0 degrees it subtracting from 360.

But I checked wolfram alpha and with in a few days went from like 359 degrees now reports 179 degrees. If J2000 was 358 degrees or so, it should be very close to that or 0 degrees approx today, January 3, 2019?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Would Astronomy be a better home for this question? $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jan 3 '19 at 10:06
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure, it's really a question of precise mathematical notation for elliptical orbit. $\endgroup$ – marshal craft Jan 3 '19 at 10:11
  • $\begingroup$ It probably may be a good or better place, they probably use it to determine exact position of stars for viewing. $\endgroup$ – marshal craft Jan 3 '19 at 10:16
  • $\begingroup$ I dont know how to easily move question? $\endgroup$ – marshal craft Jan 3 '19 at 10:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean that PlanetData["Earth", "TrueAnomaly"] is calculating the wrong angle? Then this question should be raised on mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions $\endgroup$ – Alex Trounev Jan 3 '19 at 13:14

I've found an almanac for earth perhelion up to 2100. 2019 perhelion occurred at roughly 5:00 January 3,2019. Thus the angle now of true anomaly is some extent past 0 degrees. And wolfram alpha is wrong by negative 180 degrees. By Wikipedia and other standard definitions of mean anomaly which have persisted sense Kepler's time.

While there does appear to be some deviation among sources, I find some in different time zone, on apparently from ny times reporting it occurred at a little after midnight January 3, 2019 which seems to correspond with a 5 am GMT time.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.