I understand from some studies in mathematics, that the generator of translations is given by the operator $\frac{d}{dx}$.

Similarly, I know from quantum mechanics that the momentum operator is $-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}$.

Therefore, we can see that the momentum operator is the generator of translations, multiplied by $-i\hbar$.

I however, am interested in whether an argument can be made along the lines of "since $\frac{d}{dx}$ is the generator of translations, then the momentum operator must be proportional to $\frac{d}{dx}$". If you could outline such an argument, I believe this will help me understand the physical connection between the generator of translations and the momentum operator in quantum mechanics.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, if you think about it, Taylor expansion about $p_{0}$ is really $\left.\exp(i\Delta p\partial_{x})f(p)\right|_{p=p_{0}}=f(p_{0}+\Delta p)$ for some constant $\Delta p$, with $\hbar=1$. That's the general idea here $\endgroup$ – Alex Nelson Nov 25 '12 at 17:32

In the position representation, the matrix elements (wavefunction) of a momentum eigenstate are $$\langle x | p\rangle = \psi_p(x) = e^{ipx}$$ The wavefunction shifted by a constant finite translation $a$ is $$\psi(x+a)$$ Now the momentum operator is the thing which, acting on the momentum eigenstates, returns the value of the momentum in these states, this is clearly $-i\frac{d}{dx}$.

For our momentum eigenstate, if I spatially shift it by an infinitesimal amount $\epsilon$, it becomes $$\psi(x+\epsilon) = e^{ip(x+\epsilon)} = e^{ip\epsilon}e^{ipx} = (1+i\epsilon p + ...)e^{ipx}$$ i.e. the shift modifies it by an expansion in its momentum value. But if I Taylor expand $\psi(x+\epsilon)$, I get $$\psi(x+\epsilon)= \psi(x)+\epsilon \frac{d}{dx} \psi(x)+... = \psi(x)+i\epsilon(-i\frac{d}{dx})\psi(x)+... $$ So this is consistent since the infinitesimal spatial shift operator $-i\frac{d}{dx}$ is precisely the operator which is pulling out the momentum eigenvalue.

  • $\begingroup$ Though the above is a simplified version. This wiki has some good foundations to the above. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ – Sai krishna Deep Aug 15 '15 at 10:21
  • $\begingroup$ This answer shows that the assumption $\langle x \vert p \rangle = e^{ixp}$ is equivalent to the statement that $p$ is the generator of translation. (You can start from either one and derive the other one.) But when I read the question, it seems to me like the OP is asking for something much more fundamental than that. $\endgroup$ – sasquires Oct 10 '18 at 21:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.