Is this solution in Conquering the Physics GRE incorrect? [closed]

In Conquering the Physics GRE 2nd edition, Exam 3 problem 20, the statement is as follows: A metal bar is pulled at constant velocity $$v\mathbf{\hat{x}}$$ along two metal rails a distance $$d$$ apart connected by a resistor or resistance R, as shown in the diagram. There is a magnetic field, pointing into the page, of magnitude $$B = Cx$$, where $$x=0$$ is the initial position of the bar. At time $$T$$, how much energy has been dissipated in the resistor thus far, as a function of $$T$$?

The solution is to first find the flux as a function of time, then the EMF, then the power dissipated by the resistor, then the energy. My method is to compute the flux as:

$$\Phi = \iint \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{S} = \iint (Cx\mathbf{\hat{z}})\cdot(dx\,dy\,\mathbf{\hat{z}}) = \int_0^d dy \int_0^{vt} dx\,Cx = \frac{1}{2}Cd(vt)^2 = \frac{1}{2}Cv^2t^2d$$

However, the solution says "Since the magnetic field is perpendicular to the loop, the flux through the loop is $$\Phi = BA = C(vt)(vtd) = C v^2t^2 d$$." The errata states that one of the answers was misprinted but that the solution is correct. Am I crazy or is the solution wrong? $$\Phi = BA$$ should only be true if $$B = const.$$ correct?

closed as off-topic by John Rennie, Kyle Kanos, ZeroTheHero, Cosmas Zachos, stafusaDec 27 '18 at 23:06

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – John Rennie, Kyle Kanos, ZeroTheHero, Cosmas Zachos, stafusa
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• On the very last page of the linked errata, their correction is precisely what you say here. – J. Murray Dec 22 '18 at 22:28
• I didn’t read your question, but I found an error in one of their solutions and just sent them an email. They’re very quick to respond – InertialObserver Dec 22 '18 at 22:43
• Oh I did not realize that the errata was separated into versions, I only saw the version 2 correction. Thanks for pointing that out @J.Murray, glad I'm not crazy – Kai Dec 22 '18 at 22:52
• It seems to depend on what is meant. Perhaps they mean there is a time changing (but uniform) B field? Because the way you have interpreted it B is not divergence-less (and the problem is also sensitive to the location of the origin, which is not well-specified). – Green Apples Dec 22 '18 at 22:58