From book "Introduction to Tensor Analysis and the Calculus of Moving Surfaces" by Pavel Grinfeld, Edition 2013 :

The component $A^{i}(t)$ of acceleration $\mathbf{A}(t)$ of the particle from the preceding exercise is given by \begin{equation} A^{i} = \frac{dV^{i}}{dt}+\Gamma_{jk}^{i}V^{j}V^{k} \tag{5.71} \end{equation}

What is the proof of this equation?


closed as off-topic by Aaron Stevens, Frobenius, ZeroTheHero, Jon Custer, Kyle Kanos Dec 23 '18 at 12:40

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Homework-like questions should ask about a specific physics concept and show some effort to work through the problem. We want our questions to be useful to the broader community, and to future users. See our meta site for more guidance on how to edit your question to make it better" – Aaron Stevens, Frobenius, ZeroTheHero, Jon Custer, Kyle Kanos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Hi Pinton. Welcome to Phys.SE. Note that res. recom. qs are restricted on Phys.SE. Why don't you just ask for the proof directly? $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Dec 21 '18 at 14:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic: 1. Because I thought people rather prefer to refer to a proof instead of writing that here. 2. The question is edited as you said. $\endgroup$ – Pinton Dec 21 '18 at 14:14
  • $\begingroup$ 1. They still can. 2. Better. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Dec 21 '18 at 14:18
  • $\begingroup$ The first term here was called relative acceleration: $\nabla_u\nabla_u n+R(n,u)u=0$, is that the same thing as the acceleration you are asking for? $\endgroup$ – Emil Dec 21 '18 at 14:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Suggest you learn about the geodesic equation if you have not already done so. You eqn you quoted is basically saying "how much acceleration is there in addition to the part associated with free-fall motion." $\endgroup$ – Andrew Steane Dec 21 '18 at 16:24

Let $\mathbf{R}(t)$ represent the position of the particle. Then, we have

$$\begin{align} \mathbf{V}(t) = \mathbf{R}'(t) = &\frac{\partial \mathbf{R}}{\partial Z^{i}}\frac{\partial Z^{i}}{\partial t}, \\ =& \mathbf{Z}_{i}\frac{\partial Z^{i}}{\partial t}, \\ =& \mathbf{Z}_{i}V^{i},\end{align}$$


$$\begin{align} \mathbf{A}(t) = \mathbf{V}'(t) =& (\mathbf{Z}_{i})'\frac{\partial Z^{i}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{Z}_{i}(\frac{\partial Z^{i}}{\partial t})', \\ =&(\frac{\partial Z_{i}}{\partial Z^{j}}\frac{\partial Z^{j}}{\partial t})\frac{\partial Z^{i}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{Z}_{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\frac{\partial Z^{i}}{\partial t}), \\ =& \Gamma^{k}_{ij}\mathbf{Z}_{k}\frac{\partial Z^{j}}{\partial t}\frac{\partial Z^{i}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{Z}_{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}V^{i}.\end{align} $$

By exchanging $i$, $j$, and $k$ in the first term, we end up with

$$\begin{align} \mathbf{A}(t) = & \Gamma^{i}_{jk}\mathbf{Z}_{i}\frac{\partial Z^{j}}{\partial t}\frac{\partial Z^{k}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{Z}_{i} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}V^{i},\\ = & (\Gamma^{i}_{jk}V^{k}V^{j} + \frac{\partial}{\partial t}V^{i})\mathbf{Z}_{i},\end{align}$$

which concludes

$$A^{i} = \Gamma^{i}_{jk}V^{k}V^{j} + \frac{\partial}{\partial t}V^{i}$$



Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.