3
$\begingroup$

The spin-statistics theorem says that having a system of identical fermions, the total wavefunction is antisymmetric with respect to exchange of any two fermions.

My question is, does this hold for antifermions too?

I am curious about this:

The neutral pion is formed by up + antiup or down + antidown quarks. Do these constituents follow the spin-statistics theorem inside the neutral pions? i.e., does the wavefunction of the neutral pion have to be antisymmetric under exchange of the quark and the antiquark?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The spin-statistics theorem says that having a system of identical fermions, the total wavefunction is antisymmetric with respect to exchange of any two fermions. Your statement of the theorem isn't correct. A fermion is (by definition) a particle obeying Fermi-Dirac statistics. Fermions have antisymmetric wave functions. The theorem says that half-integer spin particles are fermions, integer spin ones are bosons. $\endgroup$
    – Elio Fabri
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 20:13

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

A quark and its antiparticle are not identical, so the theorem doesn't apply. It would apply to 2 identical antifermions though.

Also, note that the neutral pion isn't an "up + antiup or down + antidown quark" but the linear combination:

$\frac{u \bar{u} - d \bar{d}}{\sqrt{2}}$

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Could you provide a source where the fact that it does apply for identical antifermions is stated? $\endgroup$
    – Luismi98
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 3:42
  • $\begingroup$ Could you also tell me why the relative orbital angular momentum of a quark+antiquark in a pion is always equal to 0? $\endgroup$
    – Luismi98
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 3:52
  • $\begingroup$ Antiquarks, positrons, antineutrinos etc... are not different kinds of particles than, respectively quarks, electrons and neutrinos. They are still fermions and obey the same laws. Antifermion just suggests that they are the conventionally designated "anti" version of the particle. If (however unlikely) we had discovered the positron before the electron we would call them the other way around $\endgroup$
    – MannyC
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 6:01
  • $\begingroup$ The antisymmetrization requirement applies to all half-integer spin particles. It may be tough to find a source that explicitly states this for antiparticle components, but I'll look. $\endgroup$
    – alexchandel
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 6:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean by "relative", but a pion's orbital angular momentum doesn't have to be 0. By definition, a pion is a $J^{P\,C}=\mathrm{(even)}^{-+}$ light unflavored meson with I=1. This naively decomposes to S=0, L=even, and anything matching it is defined as a pion. Check out the pi(2)(1670). Its actual quark content is a matter of debate. $\endgroup$
    – alexchandel
    Commented Dec 19, 2018 at 9:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.