1
$\begingroup$

I'm working on the following problem:

In 4-dimensional notations, given a transformation matrix

transformation matrix

Calculate the matrices $\Lambda_{\mu\nu}$, $\Lambda_\mu^\nu$ and $\Lambda^{\mu\nu}$

The matrix $\Lambda_\mu^\nu$ seems simple enough, as it should simply be the transpose of $\Lambda_\nu^\mu$, which in this case is identical s.t. $\Lambda_\mu^\nu = \Lambda_\nu^\mu$.

As I understand it however, $\Lambda_\mu^\nu$ and its transpose are invariant matrices, but $\Lambda_{\mu\nu}$ and its transpose are only tensors (not invariant, not matrices).

I've looked for other examples of such a transformation, but so far I only get tensors with both lower or upper indices that are used as a notation for matrix dot products.

Is this a trick question? Or is there a way to solve this?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This seems like a relativity problem with a non-Euclidean metric tensor. If I am correct you need to raise and lower indices by applying the metric tensor. If you are dealing with a flat space-time you have either diag(-1, 1, 1, 1) or diag(1, -1, -1, -1) depending on signature.

Lambda_mu_nu = g_mu_alpha*Lambda^alpha_nu, summed over alpha.

Pardon my archaic notation ^ is an upper index, _ a lower index.

For example the (0,0) entry of the new tensor would be:

Lambda_0_0 = g_0_0 * Lambda^0_0 + g_0_1 * Lambda^1_0 + g_0_2 * Lambda^2_0 + g_3_0 * Lambda^3_0

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You are right, sorry. I'm doing a course that is dealing with both electrodynamics and minkowski space - I put the wrong tag. $\endgroup$ – enzolima Dec 17 '18 at 14:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I didn't even see the tag. Does my answer help? $\endgroup$ – ggcg Dec 17 '18 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ I'm trying to work it out explicitly now. This notation is new to me so I'm a bit slow with it. $\Lambda_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\alpha}*\Lambda^\alpha_\nu = \begin{bmatrix}g_{00}\Lambda^0_0 & g_{01}\Lambda^1_0 & g_{02}\Lambda^2_0 & g_{30}\Lambda^0_3\\g_{10}\Lambda^0_1 & g_{11}\Lambda^1_1 & g_{12}\Lambda^2_1 & g_{31}\Lambda^1_3\\g_{20}\Lambda^0_2 & g_{21}\Lambda^1_2 & g_{22}\Lambda^2_2 & g_{32}\Lambda^2_3\\g_{30}\Lambda^0_3 & g_{31}\Lambda^1_3 & g_{32}\Lambda^2_3 & g_{33}\Lambda^3_3\end{bmatrix}$ right? $\endgroup$ – enzolima Dec 17 '18 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ We are using diag[1,-1,-1,-1] in class. So my result would then be a matrix $\begin{bmatrix}cosh(\theta) & 0 & 0 & -sinh(\theta)\\0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\sinh(\theta) & 0 & 0 & -cosh(\theta)\end{bmatrix}$ $\endgroup$ – enzolima Dec 17 '18 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ that last column in my first comment has wrong indices, let's pretend they are the other way around :P $\endgroup$ – enzolima Dec 17 '18 at 15:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.