1
$\begingroup$

My question stems from a question on the Dutch VWO-level highschool state exam (from 1993) concerning a device to measure the earth's electric field. It consists of two plates positioned above one another, as shown in this image:

Two perpendicular plates to measure the earth's electric field

When the upper plate covers the lower plate, the charge that has built up on the lower plate will flow back to earth / ground, as it is no longer held by the electric field.

From a different perspective, the device looks like this:

Upper plate is actually a disk with holes that will rotate over the lower plate

The upper disk now starts to spin, periodically covering and uncovering the lower plate. As a charge builds up in / flows back to earth from the lower plate (depending on the position of the upper disk), a current flows through the Amp meter A. This current is used to determine the strength of the electric field. Here's a graph of the current:

The current as measured by Amp meter A in time

One of the questions on the exam was to plot this same graph (current I in time t) if the upper disk were to spin twice as fast. The answer is the following graph:

Current in time if disk were to spin twice as fast

The period is twice as short, and the current through the Amp meter is twice as high.

My question concerns this last aspect: Why is the current twice as high if the disk spins twice as fast? I would think that the current's magnitude would only depend on the strength of the electric field, not the rotation of the upper disk.

This has been bothering me for days, hopefully one of you can shine some light on this!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you sure that this is a real current Amp meter reading? Or is it just a picture to illustrate the effect? $\endgroup$ – Alex Trounev Dec 12 '18 at 0:01
  • $\begingroup$ According to the exam question, the current I is measured with an ideal ammeter. Also, the official answer specifically mentions the current being twice the size. $\endgroup$ – Wub Mans Dec 12 '18 at 14:43
0
$\begingroup$

I will give an explanation following the logic of school teachers and examiners. The current is determined by the change in the electric charge of the bottom plate $I=k_1dq/dt$. The charge is determined by the electric field and the unshielded area of the bottom plate $q=k_2ES(t)$.The unshielded area $S(t)$ is a periodic function with a period $2\pi /\omega $, and in this case S is determined by the angle, which linearly depends on time as $\pm \omega t$. Finally we find $I=\pm k\omega E$ is also a periodic function with a period $2\pi /\omega $. The constant $k$ depends on the geometry of the system. If we double the frequency, the amplitude of the current will double, and the period will be halved. To prove all this we need to create a 3D model of the device. I can create this model if the society supports me (at least they do not delete this answer).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, so the current I is not proportional to the strength of the electric field itself, but to the rate of change at which the lower plate is 'exposed' to the electric field? Which is the rate of change of your S(t) ? $\endgroup$ – Wub Mans Dec 13 '18 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ This is correct from the point of view of school teachers. In fact, there is an edge effect that needs to be calculated. $\endgroup$ – Alex Trounev Dec 13 '18 at 12:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.