1
$\begingroup$

Sakurai initially says that density operator evolves with time because state kets evolve with time. But for an ensemble in thermal equilibrium, its partial differentiation is zero.

As far as I know, thermal equilibrium means the temperature is same everywhere and no heat flows between the particles. How is it anyway related to time? Why does the density operator stop evolving?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The equality of temperatures is a condition ensuring thermal equilibrium. But equilibrium primarily refers to a stable time independent condition of the system. In particular, all the average values of every observable must be stationary. This can be achieved only by stationary density matrices.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

At thermal equilibrium, the density matrix can be written as \begin{equation} \hat{\rho}_{\text{eq}} = \frac{e^{-\beta \hat{H}}}{\mathcal{Z}}, \end{equation} where $\mathcal{Z} = \text{Tr}\ e^{-\beta \hat{H}}$ is the partition function. The states are distributed thermally, and the density operator can be written diagonally in the basis of energy eigenstates, so it commutes with the Hamiltonian. Since the time evolution of the density operator is proportional to its commutator with the Hamiltonian, evolution stops if the commutator vanishes.

Eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are stationary states and do not evolve in time. Since the density matrix is diagonal, we simply have different probabilities for different stationary states with no interference between them.

I should also connect how the commutator with $\hat{H}$ relates to what you stated. As you say, the density operator evolves with time because state kets evolve with time. To see this, write the density operator in terms of an outer product of bras and kets; take the time derivative, applying the product rule; and apply the Schrödinger equation (and its Hermitian conjugate for the bras). From this, the commutator naturally pops out. If these bras and kets are stationary states, then all of the time derivatives vanish.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.