1
$\begingroup$

In Griffith's QM, example 1 chapter 1, what is the intuition behind using the probability of camera flash interval to get the probability density equation in terms of "dx".

Griffith says that evidently $$ \rho(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{hx}} $$ which is not so evident for me,

how does the probability of camera flashing get the probability density in terms of "dx"

$$ \frac{dt}{T}=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{hx}}dx $$ I am having a tough time digesting the logic

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It might be better to copy the relevant passage from Griffiths' text so that those w/o the book might be able to answer this question. $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    Commented Dec 4, 2018 at 12:36

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I think that Griffiths' explanation is indeed a bit lacking, but it isn't hard to see what he's doing.

First, let's consider an alternative way to solve the problem. Let $T$ be the amount of time the ball spends in the air. Then, $$x(t) = \frac 1 2 g t^2 \rightarrow h = \frac 1 2 g T^2 \rightarrow T = \sqrt{\frac{2h}{g}}$$

Since the probability of a sample being taken in any time between $t$ and $t + dt$ is constant and since the probability that a given sample occurs sometime between $t = 0$ and $t = T$ must be $1$, we have

$$\rho (t)dt = \frac 1 T dt.$$

Now, to find the average of $x$ over this time interval, we take (Equation 1.9 from Section 1.1 in Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed.) $$\langle x\rangle=\int_0^T x(t)\rho(t)dt = \int_0^T \frac{1}{2}gt^2\frac 1 T dt = \frac{gT^2}{6} = \frac h 3.$$

Griffiths, instead of doing this, chose to make a change of the integration variable from $t$ to $x$. Again, $$x = \frac 1 2 g t^2 \rightarrow dx = g t dt \rightarrow \frac {dx} {gtT} = \frac{dt}{T}.$$ Substitiuing in $t$ and $T$ gives, $$\frac{dt}{T} = \frac {dx} {g} \sqrt{\frac{g}{2x}\frac{g}{2h}} = \frac{dx}{2\sqrt{hx}} \rightarrow \rho(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{hx}},$$ as needed. This gives the same answer. I don't know why Griffiths wanted to do it like this, though. Perhaps he wanted to keep things consistent with working in $x$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ yes thanks i see it now $$ \frac{\partial t}{T} = \rho(t) = \frac{\partial x}{gtT} $$ $$ \rho(t = \sqrt{\frac{2x}{g}}) $$ $$ \rho(x) = \frac{\partial x}{\sqrt{4hx}} $$ as what you said quote "perhaps griffiths wanted to keep things consistent with his equations [16],[17],[18],[19] which all seem to be described in terms of position rather then time " probably explains it $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 11:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.