From a cursory examination of the literature I've gathered the following: it seems that ordered systems have a "clean" critical point, at which the system makes a sharp phase transition, and that disordered systems have a "dirty" critical point which is perturbed from the clean critical point due to the randomness of the system. A Griffiths phase then occurs when the control parameter is between the clean and dirty critical points, and is characterized by rare occurrences of local order in an otherwise disordered phase.

Is this correct? What does "rare" really mean? Is this a recently discovered phenomenon?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I was interested in this question, so I looked around and found the following paper; arxiv.org/pdf/1005.2707v3.pdf I think your summary is the right idea roughly. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 15, 2012 at 22:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @DylanSabulsky I think that could be an answer, or definitely a good start to one. (Though it's better to link to the abstract page on arXiv, not the PDF) $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Commented Nov 16, 2012 at 0:10
  • $\begingroup$ Oh sorry, I'll make sure to do that next time. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16, 2012 at 2:10
  • $\begingroup$ Here is the abstract page on arXiv^^ $\endgroup$
    – Dale
    Commented Jun 16, 2013 at 0:17
  • $\begingroup$ Why is Bose glass a Griffiths phase? $\endgroup$
    – Timothy
    Commented Feb 19, 2014 at 18:47

1 Answer 1


(This is a very qualitative description of the link between rare regions, Griffiths effects and Bose glasses. I am happy to add details and references where needed.).
I will focus on cold atoms implementations, as this is my field.

Rare regions

Take a potential landscape with a pure, random, uncorrelated disorder:

enter image description here

Because of the purely random nature of the disorder, it is quite rare to have a region in which the size of the flucuations is quite small.
So rare regione = region with small to no disorder.

Anderson localisation & Bose glass

In condensed matter, a disordered potential may induce the single-particle phenomenon of Anderson localisation. This is an insulating state, but unlike the band insulator it is in a non-crystalline solid, and unlike the Mott insulator it is not a many-body/strong correlations effect. Intuitively, it is understood as the wavefunction reflecting from all the random facets of the potential landscape. If and when these reflections are of the same mangitude of the original one, it leads to destructive interference and hence spatial localisation (image): enter image description here


Anderson developed this theory for non-interacting particles, but it turns out that disorder-induced insulators$^\dagger$ are resilient against moderate interactions. This is called a Many-Body Localised state, or MBL.

In the literature, however, the term "MBL" has been mostly used for fermions in highly excited states. This is because Pauli blocking would intuitively place atoms in higher states, hence if localisation has reached them as well it is "more of a big deal".

The term Bose glass is more common for bosons (duh) and in their ground state. The first experimental realisation was Fallani (arxiv paper) in 1D. A 2D version was done by Choi (arxiv paper) though I would not call it a glass since they used quenches -- i.e. not probing the ground state.

Superfluid - Bose glass - Mott insulator

The Bose glass comes up in the phase diagram of bosons in the tight-binding model (Bose-Hubbard):

enter image description here

where these pictures are from the Fallani paper above, $U$ is the on-site energy, $J$ the next-neighbour tunnelling ("how much atoms can move around, transport") and $\Delta$ the disorder strength:

enter image description here

It was known that, in the absence of disorder, bosons undergo a transition from a superfluid (off diagonal long range order, phase coherence, gapless excitations) to a Mott insulator (no phase coherence, gapped excitations). This is controlled by $J/U$, i.e. superfluid when $J\gg U$ such that particles can minimise their energy by delocolasing and being long-range ordered, and an insulator when $U\gg J$ such that repulsive interactions pins the atoms on each site individually.

Adding disorder $\Delta$, introduces another phase of matter -- the Bose glass.
This is not phase coherent (like the Mott) but has gapless excitations (like the superfliud), hence it's a mixture of both. I can expand on this bit mathematically if you wish.

Phase transition: Griffits effects in the rare regions

So where do the rare regions come into play?
At the transition between a superfluid and a Bose glass.

The disorder $\Delta$ disrupts conduction over large regionsm, causing the Anderson localistaion described above.

This about being very close to the glass-superfluid transition, but from the Bose glass side. As the disorder is reduced, there are some rare regions where the disorder strength is quite small (see first picture) and which allows the wavefunction to establish "long" range order. At the transtion, these regions grow in size (percolation) and become the superfluid.

The above picture of rare regions "mediating" the transition, only applicable near the phase transition, is what is meant by Griffiths effects. Small regions can thermalise due to the decreased disorder strength, thereby disrupting MBL and recovering transport.

$^\dagger$: while zero DC conductivity is a necessary condition for disorder-induced states, it is not their defining features. The interest in these systems is that they are non-ergodic, i.e. they do not thermalise. They retain memory fo the inital conditions at long times, which makes them ideal for quantum memory and no-decoherence applications.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.