0
$\begingroup$

Ashcroft and Mermin's Solid State Physics, chapter one, has an exercise about surface plasmons. They give the electric field normal to the surface of the metal as $E_z=Be^{iqx}e^{-Kz}$ How can this be? Wouldn't this imply a current going out of the metal? Shouldn't a negative charge accumulate at the boundary, cancelling the field?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Why would it imply a current? $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Nov 22, 2018 at 5:39
  • $\begingroup$ Well, this is inside the metal, so isn't the current equal to the conductivity times the electric field? $\endgroup$
    – Gene Naden
    Nov 22, 2018 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ I see. I thought you were talking about the field outside. $\endgroup$
    – G. Smith
    Nov 22, 2018 at 17:32

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

It is a characteristic of conductors at electrostatic equilibrium is that the electric field upon the surface of the conductor is directed entirely perpendicular to the surface.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, yeah... But the problem statement has components both normal and parallel to the surface. $\endgroup$
    – Gene Naden
    Nov 22, 2018 at 15:15
  • $\begingroup$ And even in the interior. $\endgroup$
    – Gene Naden
    Nov 22, 2018 at 15:20
  • $\begingroup$ These are fields inside the metal, contrary to the usual treatment of conductors. It is a mystery to me. $\endgroup$
    – Gene Naden
    Nov 22, 2018 at 15:36
  • $\begingroup$ In your case, you should look at the boundary condition of Maxwell's equation in the medium from respective portions in Griffith's electrodynamic book. $\endgroup$ Nov 22, 2018 at 16:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.