I am taking a course on classical field theory, and am not entirely sure as to what motivates the for of the Lagrangian density for a complex scalar field. In my lecture notes, this is first introduced in the context of the Klein-Gordon equation, and the following statements are made:

  1. $\psi$ can be decomposed into $\psi = \psi_1 +i\psi_2$ where $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ are independent. Thus $\psi$ and $\psi*$ are independent.

  2. The Lagrangian density $L=L[\psi_1]+L[\psi_2]$ can be written $L=\frac{\partial \psi*}{\partial t}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}-\frac{\partial \psi*}{\partial x}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} - m^2\psi*\psi$.

Now I am okay with the consistency of point 2 with itself. I.e. I see that The form of the Klein-Gordan Lagrangian density given does indeed give $L=L[\psi_1]+L[\psi_2]$, and conversely writing the Klein Gordon Lagrangian as $L=L[\psi_1]+L[\psi_2]=L[\psi + \psi*]+L[\psi-psi*]$ gives the explicit form form.

However I am not at all sure why the Lagrangian density is made to be additive in $\psi_1$ and $psi_2$. I do not see the motivation for this, other than that it reproduces the Euler-Lagrange equations for each of the independent scalar fields separately. Is there any better explanation?

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.