The Abraham-Lorentz force in Electromagnetism is the recoil a charge experiences as it accelerates due to own emission of radiation.

The Newtonian theory of gravity is identical to that of electrostatics. Admittedly, Newtonian gravity doesn't have an analogue for the magnetism half of EM (as far as I'm aware), so I can't necessarily prove the existence of waves / analyse radiation / derive Abraham-Lorentz.

However, modern gravity does have propagating waves in it. Do accelerating masses have an Abram-Lorentz-like force?

  • Suggested correction: the Abraham-Lorentz force is an approximate expression of the part of retarded electromagnetic self-force that is dependent on derivatives of acceleration that a charged body experiences due to having been in a motion of variable acceleration. This acceleration does not have to be due to emission of radiation, it may be due to external forces. – Ján Lalinský Nov 9 at 2:56

Yes. Here is one investigation of the gravitational back-reaction:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.0412.pdf

However, the most common case where a gravitational back-reaction is important (and actually observed!) is a two-body system like the Hulse-Taylor binary. In this kind of situation, you can calculate the rate at which energy, momentum and angular momentum are radiated away in gravitational waves, and this is relatively easy to do analytically in a post-Newtonian approximation. Then, by conservation of these quantities, you can assume that the two-body system is losing energy, momentum, and angular momentum at that rate. I think this is much more common than trying to calculate the effect of the back-reaction forces on each of the two bodies.

The important thing is that we have observational evidence for gravitational back-reaction. The Hulse-Taylor binary, like other binaries, is inspiraling at exactly the rate expected. And the LIGO events are consistent with back-reaction... the back-reaction is what caused the black holes to spiral together and merge.

  • Minor comment to the post (v2): In the future please link to abstract pages rather than pdf files. – Qmechanic Nov 9 at 2:23

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.