# Is it possible to squat quicker than gravity?

It's definitely possible to propel your body using muscle to move towards the ground quicker than gravity.

But is it possible to squat quicker than gravity? Assuming squatting from your knees and not you bending down from your back like a lever, and that you're not gripping the ground with your feet and pulling your self down.

If you dropped a basketball from the same height as your head, would it be possible to squat below the basket ball before the basket ball hit the ground?

• Are you allowed to velcro your shoes to the floor beforehand? :) – Jeremy Friesner Nov 8 '18 at 4:42
• @sammygerbil, no I couldnt get lower then it. If I cheat and bend at the back I could. I mostly was using this to see if this could be determined as a weakness for boxers – johnny 5 Nov 8 '18 at 22:18
• I'd be curious if anyone here could perform the experiment with their phone cam set to slow-motion mode. (Sadly I cannot do it myself .. bad ankle.) – user1008646 Nov 9 '18 at 15:13

Your head would be able to beat the basketball, but your center of mass wouldn't. The reason for this is that your head is subject to the downward force due to the rest of your body, but your body is only subject to the force due to gravity and $$\mathbf{F}^\textrm{ext} = M\frac{d^2}{dt^2}\mathbf{R}$$ where $$\mathbf{R}$$ is your center of mass (which follows from Newton's second law for a particle).

• Half serious, half in jest: "Your head would be able to beat the basketball, but your center of mass wouldn't." - True in a vacuum, but not categorically true in an atmosphere ;) – marcelm Nov 7 '18 at 19:31
• So, a back-flip FTW :-) – Carl Witthoft Nov 7 '18 at 20:20
• I don't think a backflip could do it. Flapping your hands to thrust against the air, creating a vacuum between your feet and the floor, or leaping up so hard you bounce off the ceiling are possibilities (although perhaps not within the spirit of the question, or actual human ability). – Robyn Nov 7 '18 at 23:49
• This is why goalies in all sports maintain a crouch (or at least knees bent) position. It both reduces height of centre of mass, speeding up coverage low, and prepares for faster coverage upwards. – Pieter Geerkens Nov 8 '18 at 2:27
• @Robyn To be clear, with my remark about atmosphere, I meant that both the basketball and the person experience atmospheric drag. If the relative drag on the ball is greater than on the person (which is likely considering the big mass difference), then the person could actually beat the ball on the way down. Drop a basketball and an adult out of a plane, the adult should land first. The effect will be very small for the OP due to the small distance and speed involved, and other factors will dominate, so that's why my remark was tongue-in-cheek. I hadn't even considered pushing against the air! – marcelm Nov 8 '18 at 12:01

It's possible if you simultaneously throw a second basketball (or any projectile really) in the air. The upwards force you're applying to the second basketball would be applied downwards to you by the ball, thus accelerating your squatting motion.

• You can also accomplish this much better by strapping a rocket to yourself facing downwards *. * Safety not Guaranteed. – JMac Nov 8 '18 at 13:08
• Note that when weightlifters are lifting heavy overhead weights, they do this. The lift the bar, then squat down under it much faster than gravity, pushing off of the weight itself. Then they stand fully. – Mooing Duck Nov 8 '18 at 22:54

Your muscles generate internal forces, which, by themselves, cannot develop any net force on your body, that would be added to the gravitational force and increase the acceleration of your COM beyond g. The interaction of your body with the ground cannot help either, since the normal force is pointing up.

• A strong fart could translate muscle internal force and pressure into a newton's second law – Oxy Nov 8 '18 at 10:04
• Really? Then how's swimming possible? I don't mean floating on the surface. Some swimming styles also utilize the difference in density of air and water but breaststroke style propelling happens completely underwater. – ElmoVanKielmo Nov 8 '18 at 12:21
• @ElmoVanKielmo Good point. Of course, a body also propels itself using ground while walking and jumping. I've updated the answer to clarify why it does not help with squatting. – V.F. Nov 8 '18 at 13:10
• The whole point of breaststroke style is to provide high drag with your limbs during propelling phase and low drag during recovery phase. No ground interaction is involved. Since liquid mechanics apply to air, it's definitely possible to affect vertical acceleration in the air with your muscles. Birds do it to counteract gravity. It's easy to imagine a bird in an inverted flight where power of muscles moving wings would add force to gravity instead of counteracting it. I say your answer is not true. – ElmoVanKielmo Nov 8 '18 at 13:40
• @ElmoVanKielmo I'm glad you understood my point. Yes, you can do all those other things to exceed g, but the PO was very specific describing the type of a squatting he was interested in and, from that, one could conclude that he was not interested in using other means to achieve a greater than g acceleration. Anyway, everyone is entitled to their opinions and interpretations. Thanks for your comments. – V.F. Nov 8 '18 at 14:18

Yes, sort of, with qualifiers only. Otherwise, No.

To do a squat, you are in essence pulling your legs up slower than gravity is pulling your body down. To squat faster that gravity you first need to accelerate pulling your legs up faster than gravity is pulling your body down. This is possible, but then is where the qualifiers become necessary to actually "squat quicker than gravity."

In Kung Fu (I'm an instructor) there is a concept of dropping into a horse stance. Done correctly, with no jump/hop first, you are doing exactly as I described - pulling your legs up faster than gravity is pulling you down. As the speed of your body towards the ground is still limited by gravity, you briefly have pulled your feet into the air. For the Kung Fu application, this allows you to position your feet into a stance before you hit the floor.

For the main question, this introduces qualifier #1: do you consider it a squat if your body is in squatting position without being on the ground yet? If yes, then you achieved a squat faster than gravity, just not on the ground. Other answers here believe no, this would not count as you must reach the ground to be squatting.

Now for qualifier #2: do you need to be free standing, or can your feet be strapped down? I'm guessing this is what is meant by "gripping the ground" in the original post. If you can have your feet held down, then your leg muscles pulling you down can be done faster than free fall acceleration due to gravity.

Qualifier #3 is introduced by the original post as a test: do you equate squatting faster than the basketball as being sufficient? In reality, there is also air resistance. If your body has less air resistance than the basketball, then it is possible to achieve a squat on the ground, without gripping the floor, (infinitesimally) faster than the basketball would reach the same point as your head when squatting. This would beat the test, but still not technically faster than gravity.

Qualifier #4: can you weight down your shoes? This would change the equation which can be viewed in different ways. The center of mass of your body combined with the clothing would simply have a lower center of gravity and while above statements would apply normally, you are moving your body faster because you are actually starting from a lower center of gravity with less distance to go. If you treat the feet or legs as separate entities than the torso, then they can be pulling the body down faster than gravity without being pulled up into the air. If you weight them down enough that it is more than the body weight and you are not strong enough to lift the feet off the ground then any leg pulling action would only move the torso down and can go faster than gravity. The weighted shoes could be considered as "gripping" your feet and may violate the original question but it is not "gripping the ground" so may not, though with enough weight the result is effectively the same.

You cannot fall faster than gravity but you can accelerate using other forces. The question hinges on whether any other forces used still counts as a squat for this purpose.

• This post made it alot clearer to me. Now I'm Imagining someone only did leg day at the gym and then they got their feet run over by a truck so there feet are extra heavy and swollen, then they should be able to pull there selves down quicker – johnny 5 Nov 9 '18 at 17:52

Adding to PiKindOfGuy's answer: if you are able to pull your feet fast enough, essentially you will be squatting in mid air for a fraction of a second until you actually hit the ground.

I'm not able if anyone has ever tried to do that though (without jumping :) ).

• I just tried it. It works. – Jasper Nov 8 '18 at 16:07
• I'm beginning to wonder if this question is going to cause office injuries... – CactusCake Nov 9 '18 at 22:16

Acceleration due to gravity is -9.8 ms^2, and both you and the basketball start accelerating at the same rate, the only way to do this is to create some force which propels you downward and to ensure that you do not resist the acceleration of gravity. As stated above the best way to go about this is to take your legs off of the ground.

Imagine you and the basketball are in space, in free fall. Your body is straight. There is a basketball by your head. Your center of mass is near your hips.

But it wouldn't be fair to call that a "squat".

For it to be a squat you'd have to pull up your legs slowly enough that your feet remain on the ground, and still control your balance, but still fast enough to keep your head below the basketball.

• How can you pull your legs up, while keeping them on the ground? The only force applied to your body is gravity so wouldn’t your limit for keeping contact with the ground be the same force being applied to you? – johnny 5 Nov 9 '18 at 15:03
• I'm suggesting that if you pull your legs up so fast that you're entirely in the air, then it wouldn't be fair to call that a "squat". If you lift your legs at the exact same rate that you are falling, your feet would remain on the ground, and then you could call it a squat. Depends on your definition of squat, I suppose. – user1008646 Nov 9 '18 at 15:08
• My point is you could never lift your legs you could only alleavate the the force of gravity – johnny 5 Nov 9 '18 at 15:33

Yes it would, and in fact if you make any effort at all, this is inevitable.

This answer doesn't disagree with or contradict the others.

Provided you squat quickly enough that the part of your body not dropping, i.e. the part below the knees, is not applying all of its weight to the ground, this means your top half is lifting it, and to do that it must accelerate downwards faster than gravity by pulling up on the rest.

But the above answers are right, only a part of your body can do so, and only insofar as the remainder (the part below the knees) does the opposite - effectively becomes weightless to the same extent.

It's worth mentioning that gravity doesn't fall at a certain speed, it accelerates at a certain rate so technically it is actually the acceleration of some part of your body which would exceed this rate of acceleration. This is actually guaranteed at least momentarily, if you make any effort whatsoever.