1
$\begingroup$

I have performed a Monte Carlo simulation of the classical Heisenberg model for a simple 2D square lattice. But I obtain some strange results. In fact, there is clearly a phase transition and a magnetized phase for low temperatures.

I attach some plots of the results.

enter image description here

enter image description here

enter image description here

I know that the symmetry can be broken only for $T=0$. I've checked multiple times the code I wrote and all seems ok. I have run some simulation of the 3D Heisenberg model and all went fine. I have also estimated some critical exponents for the 3D model with good accuracy so I don't think my code is bugged. What could be the reason of this behavior?

I have already read Phase transition in 2D Heisenberg model and I use the correct way to sample point on the sphere.

EDIT:

For each sample, I compute and save the average magnetization per spin $\vec m_i$ and the system energy $E_i$

In the analysis, I simply compute the mean of the magnitude $\langle | \vec m | \rangle$ for the first plot.

In the second one, the heat capacity per spin is estimated by

$$ c_v = \frac{1}{L^2} \frac{\langle E^2 \rangle - \langle E \rangle^2}{T^2} $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Should be the 2D Heisenberg model without phase transitions because of Mermin-Wagner theorem? $\endgroup$ – skdys Nov 5 '18 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ Oh sorry, I somehow read Ising model. You are right, MW forbids symmetry breaking in the Heisenberg model. $\endgroup$ – Nephente Nov 5 '18 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ Can you expand on how you're calculating the mean magnetization and the heat capacity? Is this the classical or quantum Heisenberg model? $\endgroup$ – Jahan Claes Nov 5 '18 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ I added the formula I used. They are the simple ones to compute thermodynamic quantity by the fluctuations. The model is the classical Heisenberg model. $\endgroup$ – skdys Nov 5 '18 at 18:46
3
$\begingroup$

This model (the classical Heisenberg model, with 3-component spins, on a 2D $L\times L$ square lattice) is one of the challenging ones. I believe that the current thinking is that there is not a true phase transition, but instead it exhibits pseudocritical behaviour: the correlation length becomes extremely large, but not infinite. The latest publication that I found is by Y Tomita, Phys Rev E, 90, 032109 (2014), and there a finite-size-scaling analysis was employed on systems up to $1024\times1024$. Also, the Monte Carlo simulations employed special techniques (Swendsen-Wang cluster updating). I'm afraid that I couldn't find an open-access version of the paper cited above.


[EDIT following OP comment]

In the paper I cited, the XY model is also studied, and compared with the Heisenberg model. The conclusion seems to be that they are different, but it is very difficult to show the difference unless considerable computational effort is spent, and a complicated finite size analysis is conducted. In both cases a peak in the heat capacity curve is seen, and a "critical temperature" can be identified. So, there will appear to be a phase transition. The next question is whether this is a true transition, with thermodynamic properties and the correlation length scaling in a systematic way (with critical exponents) as the system size becomes very large. For the XY model, this seems to be the case; for the Heisenberg model, it seems not.

On the face of it, while a BKT phase transition for the XY model can be explained in terms of topological defects in the configurations of spins confined to the plane, the Heisenberg model doesn't have these well-defined defects. So a BKT transition is not expected for the Heisenberg model. Nonetheless, the system has been known for years to exhibit behaviour looking like a phase transition. It has been an area of active research, trying to prove it one way or the other. This paper I found is just the latest (I think) of several papers on the topic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am a student and this is just a project. For now, I only need to understand if the behavior I observed is "real" or an artifact of some error I have made. I know what BKT transitions are and I had guessed this can be some kind of these transitions. Can it be? I don't know the phenomenology of these transitions. I believed that, since they are not strictly phase transitions, the heat capacity should not have any peak. $\endgroup$ – skdys Nov 5 '18 at 19:04
  • $\begingroup$ I've added a couple of paragraphs to my answer to try and clarify. I think the bottom line is that you shouldn't worry about seeing the characteristic behaviour of a phase transition, because this is what others have seen over the years, even though there seems to be no good reason in principle why a true phase transition should happen for this system. $\endgroup$ – user197851 Nov 5 '18 at 19:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.