1
$\begingroup$

The theta vacua$^1$ of a Yang-Mills quantum theory are given by $$|\theta\rangle=\sum\limits_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}e^{in\theta}|n\rangle.$$ In Srednicki's Quantum Field Theory, he claims that the energy of a theta vacuum is proportional to $-\cos\theta$ so that the theta vacuum labelled by $\theta=0$ has the minimum energy. For other values of $\theta\neq 0$, the corresponding theta vacua $\{|\theta\rangle\}$ will have higher energies. Why are then the states $\{|\theta\rangle\}$ with $\theta\neq 0$ are referred to as vacua?

$^1$ As far as I understand, due to the possibility of tunnelling mediated by instantons the states $|n\rangle$ are not the true ground states of the theory. Gauge field configurations labelled by $n$ are minimum energy configurations only in the classical theory.

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ 1. Are $|n\rangle$ true vacua of the theory? 2. For a fixed $\theta$, one has eigenstates $|\theta\rangle$ of $H$. I have no problem with that. But for any $\theta$, energy is not minimum. Only for $\theta=0$, the energy is minimum. So shouldn't the state $|\theta=0\rangle$ be called the theta vacuum and the rest of the states $|\theta\rangle$ with $\theta\neq 0$ simply as eigenstates of $H$? @ACuriousMind $\endgroup$ – SRS Oct 31 '18 at 19:43
2
$\begingroup$

There is no tunnelling between the $\theta$-vacua, so each of them forms a ground state for its own superselection sector of the space of states, and it is wholly irrelevant how their absolute energy compares with the other $\theta$-vacua (without tunnelling, why would the energy matter?). Such a ground state is usually called a vacuum.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Did I say there is tunnelling between theta vacua? I said there is tunnelling between $|n\rangle$ states. @ACuriousMind $\endgroup$ – SRS Oct 31 '18 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ @SRS No. I just reiterated that there is none. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind♦ Oct 31 '18 at 19:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So two different $\theta$ vacua belong to two different Hilbert spaces? But you agree that two different $\theta$ vacua are not degenerate unless we add different constants to make them degenerate? @ACuriousMind $\endgroup$ – SRS Oct 31 '18 at 19:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.