Would Earth clocks tick faster than a clock on a GPS satellite if we disregard gravitational time dilation? If we disregard the time dilation caused by a GPS satellite being in lower gravity, would earth's clocks tick faster or slower from the satellite's perspective?
Edit. From earth, we understand that a clock on a GPS satellite would tick 38 microseconds per day faster than our clocks. From the satellites perspective, do our clocks tick 38 microseconds per day slower, or 52 microseconds per day slower?
That's 45 microseconds per day due to earth's higher gravitational effecient and 7 microseconds per day due to earth's relative motion. 
 A: 
Would earth clocks tick faster than a clock on a GPS satellite if we disregard gravitational time dilation?

Yes.
The fractional difference in clock rates is given by
$$\frac{1}{c^2}\left(\Delta\Phi-\frac{v^2}{2}\right)=5.2\times10^{-10}-0.9\times 10^{-10},$$
where $\Phi$ is the gravitational potential. See eq. (53) of Ashby, "Relativity in the Global Positioning System," Living Reviews in Relativity (open access). The gravitational term is bigger than the kinematic term, and they have opposite signs. If the gravitational term was absent, the kinematic term would cause the over-all effect to have the opposite sign.
A: If you ignore the effects of gravity, then, if the satellite is moving at speed $v$, an earthbound observer will say that its clocks are running slow by a factor of $\sqrt{1-v^2}$.  
Of course an observer on the satellite will say that the earth clocks are running slow by the same factor, but the observer on the satellite keeps moving from one (instantaneous) frame to another, and so keeps revising his opinion of when the earth clock was set to noon.  
