Entangled particles So we have two particles (A and B) that are entangled.
From what I understand, entanglement isn't destroyed, it is only obscured by subsequent interactions with the environment.
Particle A goes zooming off into outer space.
10 years later, Particle B becomes incorporated into my brain.
The day after that, an alien scientist measures the entangled property on Particle A.
This will have some immediate non-local effect on Particle B won't it?
And since B's state has been altered (in some sense), and it is part of my brain, then my brain state has been altered as well, hasn't it?
Maybe only a tiny amount, obscured by the many environmental interactions that the two particles have been subjected to since the initial entanglement, but in a way that is real and at least conceivably significant.
And if that is true, then to the extent that mental states supervene on brain states, my mental state would also have been altered by non-local effects.
Or is that wrong?
Thanks!
 A: 
From what I understand, entanglement isn't destroyed, it is only obscured by subsequent interactions with the environment.

Depends on how you view it. There is an explanation of quantum measurement (called decoherence) in which this is true. I will not be using that explanation in this post because it's unnecessarily complicated.

This will have some immediate non-local effect on Particle B won't it?

Nope. When an alien scientist measures particle A, it does not have an effect on particle B. Specifically, it does not induce any sort of change in particle B that can be detected. 
Of course, we would say that the quantum state of particle B (technically: the combined quantum state of the pair AB) has changed, but changes of this nature in the quantum state can't be detected. For example, suppose the entangled state, written in a basis of energy levels, is
$$|\psi_1\rangle =  \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(|1\rangle|2\rangle + |2\rangle|1\rangle\right)$$
so that if particle A has an energy of 1 (in unspecified units), particle B will have an energy of 2, and vice versa. Suppose the alien scientist measures the energy of particle A to be 1. The state of the pair AB becomes
$$|\psi_2\rangle = |1\rangle|2\rangle$$
Then, the next day, when your brain measures the energy of particle B, it will get 2 as the result. But as far as your brain is concerned, the energy of particle B could have just been 2 all along. Or it could have had some arbitrary probability distribution with 2 as one of the possible results. The fact that the state changed from $|\psi_1\rangle$ to $|\psi_2\rangle$ has no effect, and could not have been detected by your brain.

And if that is true, then to the extent that mental states supervene on brain states,

If by that you mean that your thoughts are determined by quantum states, that's definitely false.
A: Even with quantum entanglement, quantum information still can't be transmitted faster than light. This is the no-signaling theorem.
A: Are we talking about "entanglement" in the sense of one particle controlling the other, or simply about our knowledge of the particles?  As I understand it, one particle must have left spin and the other right spin by conservation of angular momentum; human minds know this.  Then if one particle is observed to have left spin, human minds know that the other one must have right spin.  There is no communication or interaction between the particles themselves.  The connection is made in the human mind, in the understanding of the situation.  Can we say it is the same as counting a bunch of apples?  The bunch is not altered by the counting; only our knowledge of it is altered. 
