I'm a software developer interested in learning quantum mechanics to simulate chemistry. I know it's a very difficult topic, so I consider it a long term "someday/maybe" goal, and I’m not sure it's even possible.

I've listened to some video lectures in introductory QM courses like Susskind's and Brant Carlson's youtube videos, and the content so far seems far removed from computing "chemistry" things like electron orbital shapes or bond energies.

Is it possible to simulate the time evolution of something "simple" like the colliding and reacting molecules in: $2\mathrm{H}_2 + \mathrm{O}_2 \rightarrow 2\mathrm{H_2O}$? I mean simulate from first principles - pure quantum mechanics without any estimates like "pretend this atom is a mass on a spring", etc.

If it is possible, what is a rough outline of the college courses required to go from point A to B - from intro quantum mechanics to the understanding needed to write code for that simulation? (Maybe it's less about the physics and more about tricky computational techniques of estimating solutions to equations?)

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I have no definitive answer, just an observation that $H_2 O$ from the perspective of "pure QM" would probably be modeled as 13 different bodies interacting (2 protons and 2 electrons for $H_2$ and 1 nucleus and 8 electrons for Oxygen)...when you get 2 of those in there, that's 26 bodies you're looking at. Solving the Schroedinger equation for 26 (coupled) bodies simultaneously even numerically seems very difficult to me. $\endgroup$ – enumaris Oct 12 '18 at 20:47
  • $\begingroup$ People do this, but usually just for approaches along some symmetry directions, I think. That is difficult enough. To do the complete quantum chemistry for all possible approaches (not just straight lines) - I doubt whether that is attempted. $\endgroup$ – user137289 Oct 12 '18 at 20:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Even the interaction of electrons with hydrogen is difficult. $\endgroup$ – Keith McClary Oct 13 '18 at 0:43
  • $\begingroup$ I found Susskind's lectures (and corresponding book amazon.com/Quantum-Mechanics-Theoretical-Leonard-Susskind/dp/…) a useful introduction to QM. A more thorough treatment of the maths is given by Schuller youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPH7f_7ZlzxQVx5jRjbfRGEzWY_upS5K6 $\endgroup$ – Tom Collinge Oct 13 '18 at 7:32
  • $\begingroup$ A definitive answer is Landau vol III, but it is not a "college" textbook. And just the few first chaptters wont suffice. You will need the full scattering theory treatments in the advanced chapters to calculate things like collide 2H2+02→2H20 from first principles. $\endgroup$ – Kostas Oct 13 '18 at 19:59

Yes, it is possible. Working with pure quantum mechanics means you will need to solve the many-body Schrödinger equation, which has no exact solution, so some approximation must be done numerically. Different approaches into solving this equations gave birth to different numerical methods, and some methods are more efficient for solving specific problems, like the one you mentioned.

You may want to look for the terms: Ab initio, First Principles methods, computational chemistry, Density Functional Theory. I have even seen some dedicated courses on youtube.

Some popular softwares used in this field are: Gaussian, VASP, GAMESS, DMol, Quantum Espresso.


Yes, this is possible -- I used to study it in undergrad, actually. I would say that the prerequisites are probably a few semesters of quantum mechanics -- enough to learn concepts like Born-Oppenheimer approximations, perturbation theory, and angular momentum theory. A course specifically in atomic and molecular physics would also help.

As you say, and as a comment points out, the computational requirements for exactly solution of the Schrodinger equation for even something comparatively simple can be immense. There's plenty of computational effort on trying to simply this problem, and for something as large as what you propose I doubt you'd see "exact from first principles" treatment; approximations likely enter it to it. (My numerical work in undergrad would take days to run, for reactions like F + H2.)

The key word is "reactive scattering" -- the process of two molecules colliding and then a different configuration emerging. This seems like a decent review paper, if you can access it.


The other answers hit on the software that exists already and touched on how long "pure" ab inito (from first principals) calculations can take. Note: for interesting systems supercomputers are used (my group as access to one, would recommend)

The most important classes to take if you want to write your own code (I'm assuming you know how to code):

Linear Algebra - 99% of all Quantum Chemistry is matrix math

Physical Chemistry - make sure you understand underlying concepts

Quantum Physics/Chemistry - either will definitely get to into shouting distance of being able to code - but the focus is going to be on the exact answer that we get for Hydrogen not coding the modern methods

If you want a course that will actually teach you how to code the modern methods, you will probably have to go to a school that as a focused center for Quantum Chemistry or a Physics department that is branching into chemistry.

Example class titles: Advanced Quantum Chemistry, 'Beyond Hartree-Fock', or Couple Cluster Methods

If you have an interest in playing with a quantum chemistry package you can download from github: Psi4 - written in C++ and python with a python interface for input


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.